Bruce,

I would like to display a dot if and when that WStoc is turning up, with the dot at the actual value of that WStoc Line.

I tried this 

Please try the following indicator formula. Make sure it is being ovelayed into the same pane and scale as the Worden Stochastic (choose & Scale With if you are moving the indicator into the pane).

IIF(TrueInRow(WSTOC12.3 > WSTOC12.3.1, 2) = 1, WSTOC12.3, 1 / 0)

Thank you Bruce, great.

Franz J.

PS:

Don´t know this is of any interest:

Since long time for my DSS turning up I use your formula 

100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3) / ABS(XUP(XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3) ,2)))

which is working well and I don´t see any need to change it. This said could it be using the TrueInRow function to smooth its calculating? 

I think it is actually going to be longer. I don't know if it would be more efficient or not (it might be since it isn't calculating as many moving averages).

IIF(TrueInRow(XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3) > XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1, 3), 21)), 3), 2) = 1, 100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 1 / 0)

Bruce,

I take use of your formula

IIF(TrueInRow(WSTOC12.3 > WSTOC12.3.1, 2) = 1, WSTOC12.3, 1 / 0) (for the turning up case)

and I am glad I got it. But here I come with an additional question. That formula prints an up-dot not only after having an higher value before, but after having some unchanged bars before too. This is very helpful if and when the trend is changing against higher before the unchanged bars. But of course it also does print dots if and when there is no trend change (lower values before the unchanged bars). 
Is there a way to adopt that PCF for printing up dots after unchanged bars only in that cases when the trend did change?

thank you,

Franz J.

It doesn't make a difference for a lot of indicators because the odds of having the same value more than one bar in a row a pretty low. We can check for the previous direction being different however (the following looks back 10 bars).

IIF(TrueInRow(WSTOC12.3 > WSTOC12.3.1, 2) = 1 AND TrueInRow(NOT(WSTOC12.3.1 > WSTOC12.3.2), 10) > TrueInRow(NOT(WSTOC12.3.1 < WSTOC12.3.2), 10), WSTOC12.3, 1 / 0)

Thank you very much, Bruce. Great help again. 

Of course you are right with the odds, but just with the WStoc it seems to happen more often than with other indicators. A lookback period of 5 bars is good enough for this.

Thanx again,

Franz J.

You're welcome.