I understand that the TSV numberical values are meaningless, so the fact that the graph shows > 0 and the actual TSV value is minus something is meaningless.  Does this mean, then, that the visual values of TSV are all that we should be concerned with?  And further, that scaning for, e.g., stocks with TSV yearly high, we will get results with graph highs and not numerical highs? 

I hope my question is clear.

Kind thanks.

The value of Time Segmented Volume (TSV) is meaningless, but not in the sense of how the value of Cumulative MoneyStream (MS) is meaningless.

With MS, the value being above or below can depend on how much time is used for the calculations. In the case of TSV, the value should be above or below zero at the same points as the visual TSV is above or below zero as long as all of the exact same settings are used (such as time frame, period and average type).

We can check if TSV is at its high over a specified period in TC2000 v7 only if the TSV is simple. We cannot do so if the TSV is exponential because of limitations in the Personal Criteria Formula Language. The highs should be both numerical and visual however.

tx for the clarification, bruce.

You're welcome.