Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. Search | Active Topics |

Using an SSD to speed up the BackScanner experience Rate this Topic:
Previous Topic · Next Topic Watch this topic · Print this topic ·
Michaelkarasik
Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 6:04:22 PM
Platinum Customer Platinum Customer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 80

 

Bruce,

 

If I add a SSD as a second drive for use with SockFinder would it significantly speed up my experience of running the Backscanner?  If so how would I direct SF to store data and use the new SSD?

If am using a 64 bit Windows desktop.

Bruce_L
Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:44:32 PM


Worden Trainer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138

It really depends on the particular BackScan and how it is contrained as far as resources. I have found an SSD to be extremely helpful. It sped things up considerably for me (not only StockFinder, but my entire computing experience), but I could not say if it would do the same for you.

If you don't have enough RAM, that would give you more bang for the buck than an SSD, but if you do have enough RAM, then adding more wouldn't help (although you could theoretically cache your HD or SSD if you have enough RAM).

There is also the possibility that the performance is being held up by actual computations. In that case, an SSD wouldn't help either.

If you are only going to get a small SSD and put a little bit on it with most of your stuff on a larger HD, you will want to have StockFinder's price database installed on the SSD as SF usually needs to load the price data repeatedly while the program just gets loaded when you run it initially and stays there.



-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
Michaelkarasik
Posted : Thursday, December 27, 2012 10:10:18 AM
Platinum Customer Platinum Customer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 80

Version 5.1.18.17548 of StockFinder

I7 2600 CPU @ 3.40GMZ, 3,40GMZ 

16 GB RAM

op. sys. 64 bit

what size SSD would be adequate?  How do I direct the price database to the drive?

 

Bruce_L
Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 8:09:45 AM


Worden Trainer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138

I really can't make specific hardware suggestions. All of your data feeds need to be in the same folder so if you have US RealTime Minute Feed data you will need approximately 4 GB per year of market data, plus another 1 GB for the Morningstar feed.

You probably have enough RAM to set up a nice HD cache, but I could not provide any help on how to do so. You would have to research the topic on your own. RAM is a lot faster than an SSD (although for most uses, an SSD is "fast enough" that the difference might not be noticable - I'm not sure about SF specifically).

When you install the data there is an option to Change Data Location at the bottom of the window, but technical support can help you get the data onto your SSD as well.



-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
Michaelkarasik
Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 9:43:51 AM
Platinum Customer Platinum Customer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 80

Thanks

Michaelkarasik
Posted : Monday, December 31, 2012 6:14:03 PM
Platinum Customer Platinum Customer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 80

Bruce,

I just installed a SSD.  The BackScanner went from a running time of 1 min +/- to about 20 seconds!!

Thanks and I wish you a good new year.

Bruce_L
Posted : Tuesday, January 1, 2013 9:23:10 AM


Worden Trainer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138

You're welcome. I am happy to read the improvement was so dramatic. I wish you a happy and prosperous new year!



-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
Users browsing this topic
Guest-1

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.