Hi Bruce,

I know how to set the Moving average with Offset button in TC2000 V12.  I can see the plotted line on the chart.  However, I would like to use PCF % of True indication to spot light on the turning point of the Moving Average with Offset..

How do you set the condition using PCF ?

I know how to do the one without offset :  For example:

AVGC16.0 > AVGC16.1 and AVGC16.2 > AVGC16.1 , this I can spot on the turning point 1 Bar ago.

If I have the an offset of -2, in such case, how do you set the conditions to cater the -2 offset ?

Hi Bruce, any advice on this one or did I missed your reply ?

A negative offset is in effect looking at future data that doesn't exist yet. You can't create a Condition Formula utilizing a negative offset because the Personal Criteria Formula Language does not have syntax for referencing future data.

If you really need a negative offset on the Custom PCF % True Indicator, you will need to add a 1-Period Simple Moving Average to the Custom PCF % True Indicator and set the Offset in the Moving Average.

You can't actually create a Condition Formula for this. The data doesn't exist yet.

You didn't miss my reply. I'm not in the forums 24/7.

Normally I would say that bumping a topic by making another post won't affect when it gets answered, but this is not entirely true. If your topic is the only topic waiting for an answer, it is true because I'm not going to deliberately penalize a bumped topic.

However, if there are multiple questions waiting for answers, it is actually not the case that when the post gets answered is not affected.

I usually answer questions in a forum from the oldest question to the newest question by going from the bottom to the top. Posts which look like they will take a long time to answer are usually skipped so more topics can get replies in a shorter time before I come back to them.

So in this case, by bumping the post, your question got answered later than it would have otherwise had it not been bumped.

Thanks Bruce, now I understand about the offset setting.

I wasn't trying to make multiple postings to get a speedy answer. I saw couple people tagged on my original posting.. so I wasn't sure if I might have missed the answer from you.  I know you usually response really fast.. I always think your answer are crisp and very helpful.

Thanks again..

You're welcome. I just wanted you to understand why it ended up getting answered after some of the questions which got asked after your initial post (but before your second post).