WHAT IS EQUAL SO-SO IN TC2000/18 TO Awesome oscillator in think or swim

check9255@yahoo.com

thanks

http://help.tc2000.com/m/69445/l/745033-indicator-formula-template-table

(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34)) / 2

THANKS / STOCKGUY WILL TRY IT/ IS THERE ANY WAY TO MAKE IT AN INDICATOR?

Just use the formula in a Custom PCF Indicator.

I am not sure what you are asking. It is an oscillator that goes up and down through zero, it isn't really designed to be plotted on the same pane and scale as price like a moving average.

It is composed of two moving averages which could be plotted in the same pane and scale as price however.

You would plot these using Custom PCF Indicators as well. The first Custom PCF Indicator would use the following formula.

AVG(H + L, 5)

And the second Custom PCF Indicator would use the following formula.

AVG(H + L, 34)

Bruce How can we create a divergence scanner

Bullish divergence with a look back 100 bars,  Price making a lower low and awesome oscillator making a higher low and oscillator value below Zero Line

and reverse 

thanks

I can give you the general structure of the formula out to where the first low can be up to 6 bars ago, but it gets too long and slow to be practical or post in the forums if you go out any further than that.

AVG(H1 + L1, 5) < AVG(H1 + L1, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) > AVG(H1 + L1, 5) - AVG(H1 + L1, 34), 2) = 1 AND L1 < IIF(AVG(H3 + L3, 5) < AVG(H3 + L3, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H2 + L2, 5) - AVG(H2 + L2, 34) > AVG(H3 + L3, 5) - AVG(H3 + L3, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) > AVG(H3 + L3, 5) - AVG(H3 + L3, 34), L2, L1), IIF(AVG(H4 + L4, 5) < AVG(H4 + L4, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H3 + L3, 5) - AVG(H3 + L3, 34) > AVG(H4 + L4, 5) - AVG(H4 + L4, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) > AVG(H4 + L4, 5) - AVG(H4 + L4, 34), L3, L1), IIF(AVG(H5 + L5, 5) < AVG(H5 + L5, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H4 + L4, 5) - AVG(H4 + L4, 34) > AVG(H5 + L5, 5) - AVG(H5 + L5, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) > AVG(H5 + L5, 5) - AVG(H5 + L5, 34), L4, L1), IIF(AVG(H6 + L6, 5) < AVG(H6 + L6, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H5 + L5, 5) - AVG(H5 + L5, 34) > AVG(H6 + L6, 5) - AVG(H6 + L6, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) > AVG(H6 + L6, 5) - AVG(H6 + L6, 34), L5, L1), IIF(AVG(H7 + L7, 5) < AVG(H7 + L7, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H6 + L6, 5) - AVG(H6 + L6, 34) > AVG(H7 + L7, 5) - AVG(H7 + L7, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) > AVG(H7 + L7, 5) - AVG(H7 + L7, 34), L6, L1), L1)))))

The inverse has the same limitations.

AVG(H1 + L1, 5) > AVG(H1 + L1, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) < AVG(H1 + L1, 5) - AVG(H1 + L1, 34), 2) = 1 AND H1 > IIF(AVG(H3 + L3, 5) > AVG(H3 + L3, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H2 + L2, 5) - AVG(H2 + L2, 34) < AVG(H3 + L3, 5) - AVG(H3 + L3, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) < AVG(H3 + L3, 5) - AVG(H3 + L3, 34), H2, H1), IIF(AVG(H4 + L4, 5) > AVG(H4 + L4, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H3 + L3, 5) - AVG(H3 + L3, 34) < AVG(H4 + L4, 5) - AVG(H4 + L4, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) < AVG(H4 + L4, 5) - AVG(H4 + L4, 34), H3, H1), IIF(AVG(H5 + L5, 5) > AVG(H5 + L5, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H4 + L4, 5) - AVG(H4 + L4, 34) < AVG(H5 + L5, 5) - AVG(H5 + L5, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) < AVG(H5 + L5, 5) - AVG(H5 + L5, 34), H4, H1), IIF(AVG(H6 + L6, 5) > AVG(H6 + L6, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H5 + L5, 5) - AVG(H5 + L5, 34) < AVG(H6 + L6, 5) - AVG(H6 + L6, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) < AVG(H6 + L6, 5) - AVG(H6 + L6, 34), H5, H1), IIF(AVG(H7 + L7, 5) > AVG(H7 + L7, 34) AND TrueInRow(AVG(H6 + L6, 5) - AVG(H6 + L6, 34) < AVG(H7 + L7, 5) - AVG(H7 + L7, 34), 2) = 1, IIF(AVG(H + L, 5) - AVG(H + L, 34) < AVG(H7 + L7, 5) - AVG(H7 + L7, 34), H6, H1), H1)))))

Thanks

You're welcome.