| toliphint |
|
Gold User, Member, TeleChart
|
| Registered User |
|
|
|
|
| Unsure |
|
| Monday, December 13, 2004 |
| Monday, August 27, 2007 12:39:19 PM |
4
[0.00% of all post / 0.00 posts per day] |
|
Hi ------
Please help with what appears to be happening to Money Stream (MS) at
different Zoom Levels. I've contacted TS and they referred me to this forum.
Create a Daily chart with Price and MS in the Top Window. Using the
ticker PGH, use Zoom 7. Here, it appears that MS is tracking just
slightly below price.
Now go to Zoom 5. Here MS falls far below price.
Now try Zoom 2. MS is now further below price.
It would appear there is a problem with the presentation of MS at the
various Zoom Levels. If not a presentation problem, then what Zoom level
must always be used to get the proper view of MS?
Also note that the view is similarly different on a Weekly chart.
Thanks.
|
I'm getting different data for Simple Moving Averages displayed in a PCF
Test versus that displayed by the pointer window. Try this:
- Closing prices: 11/01/05
- Ticker: DIA
1. Set up a chart with a 200 day Simple MA and a 130 day Simple MA
2. Display chart of ticker: DIA
3. Create PCF: AVGC200 > AVGC130 and then Update all PCFs
4. Press period and place vertical bar on 11/01/05 to display data in
pointer window at upper left of chart. My window displays:
130 SMA = 104.55 200 SMA = 104.47
5. Edit PCF and Test it with ticker DIA. My test shows:
130 SMA = 104.69 200 SMA = 104.97
Why the differences? I realize they are trivial, but don't understand
why. It's important to the further development of my PCFs.
Thanks in advance for your help.
|
There has been much discussion in the Worden Notes of late regarding
Relative Strength Moving Averages (RSMAs) which I use extensively. Yet when
a chart is viewed with Simple Moving Averages (SMAs) and RSMAs, there is
little if any difference between the SMAs and RSMAs. For example, set up 2
tabs:
- One with SMAs (10 and 40 bars)
- The other with RSMAs (using SP-500) with 10 and 40 Averages
Swap between tabs and the visual of the averages hardly changes.
How can this be? It's hard to believe that for virtually every stock, SMAs
are nearly identical (i.e. - nearly 100% correlated to) RSMAs. This would
mean that the relative strength of a given stock over time is virtually the
same as its price movement, and thus that RSMAs (and their crossovers) are
really no different that SMAs and their crossovers.
Would appreciate your analysis.
|
|
How do I CCESS/CREATE HISTORICAL FUNDAMENTAL GRAPHS that are mentioned in the update info with the new TEleChart Gold?
|
|