Registered User
Joined: 12/7/2004
Posts: 6
|
AVGC10 > XAVGC20 AND AVGC10.6 < XAVGC20.6 AND XAVGC20 > XAVGC30 AND XAVGC20.6 < XAVGC30.6 AND C > 15 AND AVGV10 > 1000
|
Worden Trainer
Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138
|
I do not know what you are requesting as your existing formula has absolutely nothing to do with six months.
The formula is for the 10-Period Simple Moving Average being above the 20-Period Exponential Moving Average and the 20-Period Exponential Moving Average being above the 30-Period Exponential Moving Average during the current bar, but where the 10-Period Simple Moving Average was below the 20-Period Exponential Moving Average and the 20-Period Exponential Moving Average was below the 30-Period Exponential Moving Average 6 bars ago. There are additional requirements that price be above 15 and the 10-Period Simple Moving Average of volume be above 100000 shares (in TC2000 version 7, in TC2000 version 12.3, it would be above 1000 shares).
This would mean that the 10-Period Simple Moving Average crossed up through and stayed above the 20-Period Exponential Moving Average and the 20-Period Exponential Moving Average crossed up through and stayed above the 30-Period Exponential Moving Average within the most recent 5 bars. I have not found any examples where the formula returns true where this is not the case.
Things to check if your moving averages don't "seem right" or "seem to match"
-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
|