I would like to run a scan that would show me stocks that are rising in an orderly fashion. Nice steady increases over a 60 day time frame. Are there any scans that would work for this?

Thanks, Mark

About the best thing I I have been able to come up with is to check and make sure the 60-Period Linear Regression Slope and Net Change over the same period are both positive and then do a Sort in descending order of the number of up bars over the same period.

While you are probably going to still have to scroll through the charts to see if they look right, you can just Sort the following Indicator Formula in descending order to combine all of these steps:

ABS((C > C1) + (C1 > C2) + (C2 > C3) + (C3 > C4) + (C4 > C5) + (C5 > C6) + (C6 > C7) + (C7 > C8) + (C8 > C9) + (C9 > C10) + (C10 > C11) + (C11 > C12) + (C12 > C13) + (C13 > C14) + (C14 > C15) + (C15 > C16) + (C16 > C17) + (C17 > C18) + (C18 > C19) + (C19 > C20) + (C20 > C21) + (C21 > C22) + (C22 > C23) + (C23 > C24) + (C24 > C25) + (C25 > C26) + (C26 > C27) + (C27 > C28) + (C28 > C29) + (C29 > C30) + (C30 > C31) + (C31 > C32) + (C32 > C33) + (C33 > C34) + (C34 > C35) + (C35 > C36) + (C36 > C37) + (C37 > C38) + (C38 > C39) + (C39 > C40) + (C40 > C41) + (C41 > C42) + (C42 > C43) + (C43 > C44) + (C44 > C45) + (C45 > C46) + (C46 > C47) + (C47 > C48) + (C48 > C49) + (C49 > C50) + (C50 > C51) + (C51 > C52) + (C52 > C53) + (C53 > C54) + (C54 > C55) + (C55 > C56) + (C56 > C57) + (C57 > C58) + (C58 > C59)) * ABS(C > C59) * ABS(29.5 * C + 28.5 * C1 + 27.5 * C2 + 26.5 * C3 + 25.5 * C4 + 24.5 * C5 + 23.5 * C6 + 22.5 * C7 + 21.5 * C8 + 20.5 * C9 + 19.5 * C10 + 18.5 * C11 + 17.5 * C12 + 16.5 * C13 + 15.5 * C14 + 14.5 * C15 + 13.5 * C16 + 12.5 * C17 + 11.5 * C18 + 10.5 * C19 + 9.5 * C20 + 8.5 * C21 + 7.5 * C22 + 6.5 * C23 + 5.5 * C24 + 4.5 * C25 + 3.5 * C26 + 2.5 * C27 + 1.5 * C28 + .5 * C29 - .5 * C30 - 1.5 * C31 - 2.5 * C32 - 3.5 * C33 - 4.5 * C34 - 5.5 * C35 - 6.5 * C36 - 7.5 * C37 - 8.5 * C38 - 9.5 * C39 - 10.5 * C40 - 11.5 * C41 - 12.5 * C42 - 13.5 * C43 - 14.5 * C44 - 15.5 * C45 - 16.5 * C46 - 17.5 * C47 - 18.5 * C48 - 19.5 * C49 - 20.5 * C50 - 21.5 * C51 - 22.5 * C52 - 23.5 * C53 - 24.5 * C54 - 25.5 * C55 - 26.5 * C56 - 27.5 * C57 - 28.5 * C58 - 29.5 * C59 > 0)

Using Linear Regression vs Classical Peaks/Valleys for Divergence Analysis
PCF Formula Descriptions
Handy PCF example formulas to help you learn the syntax of PCFs!

Some other approaches were discussed here:

http://forums.worden.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63857