1. Today's Stock price is above the Kumo cloud
2. The Conversion line is above the Base Line
3. Today's Stock Price is above the Conversion Line
4. The Lagging Span is above the Stock Price from 26 periods prior
5. The Leading Span A is above the Leading Span B

I would like to have these conditions set up so that I could modify the settings of each as needed (like what was talked about in the "EasyScan Design for Breakouts and Bouncers" video as far as controlling the sensitivity of a scan).

If possible, I also wanted to have these conditions appear as watchlist columns that would show up with a checkmark if they were true.

Please let me know if this is possible. Thanks.

what would be the code for leading span a below leading span b. I used this code but it does not work

(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 < (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2

That formula should work fine. I tested it using a Custom PCF % True indicator and it worked correctly in all time frames.

Hi Im new at this but at the top of the page in the opening remake edeering talks about the Ichimoku training webinar.

How would I view that webinar?

It is available on the webinar archive page at http://www.worden.com/webinars/archive.

Trading with Ichimoku Clouds

Bruce,

RE creating scans using the TC200 v 12.3 for the Ichimoku cloud charts

• When creating scan conditions from the Ichimoku indicator dropdown, is the span A& B referencing today&rsquo;s data or the cloud data 26 periods into the future? It does not appear to be when I used it in a scan.  The scan produced results where toda's spans were bullish; however the cloud was bearish.
• There are no options for the lagging span in the drop down.  So the above formula (Tuesday, October 18, 2011 ) for the lagging span will work?

THX!!

Chris

Clicking on an indicator and selecting Create Scan Condition only works for the current bar. It does not work for bars in the past or bars in the future. So lagging span does not show up because it does not have a current value and the values for the cloud are the values plotted for the current bar and not for future bars.

The formulas given in my Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:59:18 AM ET post are also all for the current bar with the exception of the Lagging Span formula which notes this in its description.

You could get the results for the leading span at the point furthest in the future by eliminating all six instances of .26 in the formula.

Bruce,

THX!

Chris

Id like 9 PCFs.

Lagging Span is above the Cloud.

Lagging Span has just crossed above the Cloud today.

Price close is above the Cloud.

Price close has crossed above the Cloud today.

Price close has crossed above the Cloud and stayed above for 3 bars. ( C3 was below the cloud)

Span A has crossed above Span B today.

Span A is above Span B.

Tenkansen has crossed above Kijunsen today.

Tenkansen is above Kijunsen.

Thanks

C > (MAXH9.52 + MINL9.52 + MAXH26.52 + MINL26.52) / 4 AND C > (MAXH52.52 + MINL52.52) / 2

C > (MAXH9.52 + MINL9.52 + MAXH26.52 + MINL26.52) / 4 AND C > (MAXH52.52 + MINL52.52) / 2 AND (C1 <= (MAXH9.53 + MINL9.53 + MAXH26.53 + MINL26.53) / 4 OR C1 <= (MAXH52.53 + MINL52.53) / 2)

C > (MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 AND C > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2

C > (MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 AND C > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2 AND (C1 <= (MAXH9.27 + MINL9.27 + MAXH26.27 + MINL26.27) / 4 OR C1 <= (MAXH52.27 + MINL52.27) / 2)

C > (MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 AND C > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2 AND C1 > (MAXH9.27 + MINL9.27 + MAXH26.27 + MINL26.27) / 4 AND C1 > (MAXH52.27 + MINL52.27) / 2 AND C2 > (MAXH9.28 + MINL9.28 + MAXH26.28 + MINL26.28) / 4 AND C2 > (MAXH52.28 + MINL52.28) / 2 AND (C3 < (MAXH9.29 + MINL9.29 + MAXH26.29 + MINL26.29) / 4 OR C3 < (MAXH52.29 + MINL52.29) / 2)

I do not know if you mean where it is plotted for the current bar:

(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2 AND (MAXH9.27 + MINL9.27 + MAXH26.27 + MINL26.27) / 4 <= (MAXH52.27 + MINL52.27) / 2

Or where it is plotted at the furthest point to the right:

(MAXH9 + MINL9 + MAXH26 + MINL26) / 4 > (MAXH52 + MINL52) / 2 AND (MAXH9.1 + MINL9.1 + MAXH26.1 + MINL26.1) / 4 <= (MAXH52.1 + MINL52.1) / 2

I do not know if you mean where it is plotted for the current bar:

(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2

Or where it is plotted at the furthest point to the right:

(MAXH9 + MINL9) / 2 > (MAXH26 + MINL26) / 2 AND (MAXH9.1 + MINL9.1) / 2 <= (MAXH26.1 + MINL26.1) / 2

(MAXH9 + MINL9) / 2 > (MAXH26 + MINL26) / 2

Bruce looking at the first PCF above

it goes positive on about 3-20-15 for IBM daily.

I would think approx 2-10-15 it would go positive???

Thanks

The 2-21-14 post.

You might think so when plotting a Custom PCF % True Indicator on the chart and then comparing it to the plots, but the chart is misleading. You can ask yourself a question to figure out why.

Q: How far was Lagging Span actually plotted on March 20, 2015?

A: Lagging Span was only plotted as far as February 11, 2015 on March 20, 2015.

As a "non-cloud guy"  thats pretty funny!