Download software Tutorial videos
Subscription & data-feed pricing Class schedule


New account application Trading resources
Margin rates Stock & option commissions

Attention: Discussion forums are read-only for extended maintenance until further notice.
Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. Search | Active Topics |

Scan for Ichimoku - Bullish current and future Cloud ? Rate this Topic:
Previous Topic · Next Topic Watch this topic · Print this topic ·
Gano
Posted : Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:34:06 AM
Registered User
Joined: 8/23/2012
Posts: 59

Hi, how can I create a scan condition to ensure:

-current Ichimoku Cloud is Bullish and ;

-future Ichimoku Cloud is Bullish 

 

Thanks.

Bruce_L
Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:11:52 PM


Worden Trainer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138

A Condition Formula for Leading Span A being above Leading Span B at the most recent point where price is plotted can be written as:

(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2

A Condition Formula for Leading Span A being above Leading Span B at the far right endpoint of where it is being plotted 26 bars in the future can be written as:

(MAXH9 + MINL9 + MAXH26 + MINL26) / 4 > (MAXH52 + MINL52) / 2

A Condition Formula for Leading Span A being above Leading Span B 26-bars in the past where Lagging Span is most recently plotted can be written as:

(MAXH9.52 + MINL9.52 + MAXH26.52 + MINL26.52) / 4 > (MAXH52.52 + MINL52.52) / 2

I think you are asking to combine the first two conditions, which would result in:

(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2 AND (MAXH9 + MINL9 + MAXH26 + MINL26) / 4 > (MAXH52 + MINL52) / 2



-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
Gano
Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:32:52 PM
Registered User
Joined: 8/23/2012
Posts: 59

That's correct, that what I meant thanks.

Can you also provide the PCFs for: 

-Baseline ?

-Conversion line ?

Thanks.

Bruce_L
Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:29:56 PM


Worden Trainer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138

The values of the various lines at the point where price is most recently plotted are:

Conversion (Tenkan-Sen):

(MAXH9 + MINL9) / 2

Base Line (Kijun-Sen):

(MAXH26 + MINL26) / 2

Leading Span A (Senkou Span A):

(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4

Leading Span B (Senkou Span B):

(MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2



-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
Gano
Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:24:49 PM
Registered User
Joined: 8/23/2012
Posts: 59

Thanks Bruce.

Gano
Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 2:44:52 PM
Registered User
Joined: 8/23/2012
Posts: 59

Hi Bruce,

As per my understanging, the Lagging Line is the current Close projected 26 bars Ago. So are the following conditions correct ?

-current Lagging line is above the price 26 bars ago = C > C26 ?

-current Lagging line is below the price 26 bars ago = C < C26 ?

Thanks.

Bruce_L
Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 2:51:12 PM


Worden Trainer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138

Yes, both of the formulas you suggest would be correct.



-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
Prime90
Posted : Sunday, February 9, 2014 12:17:36 AM
Registered User
Joined: 12/30/2012
Posts: 11

QUOTE (Gano)

Hi Bruce,

As per my understanging, the Lagging Line is the current Close projected 26 bars Ago. So are the following conditions correct ?

-current Lagging line is above the price 26 bars ago = C > C26 ?

-current Lagging line is below the price 26 bars ago = C < C26 ?

Thanks.

How would one add to this formula to say lagging span is greater then the 200 day exponential moving average and A and B span 26 days ago? 

Prime90
Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 6:11:04 AM
Registered User
Joined: 12/30/2012
Posts: 11

I keep getting a syntax error when trying C26 > XAvg200

My goal is to get the current lagging span greater than the 200 day expotential moving average 26 bars ago.

Bruce_L
Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:13:39 AM


Worden Trainer

Joined: 10/7/2004
Posts: 65,138

The problem with the XAVG200 syntax is that it is not specifying the price component you are averaging. Please try the following Condition Formula:

C > XAVGC200.26 AND C > (MAXH9.52 + MINL9.52 + MAXH26.52 + MINL26.52) / 4 AND C > (MAXH52.52 + MINL52.52) / 2



-Bruce
Personal Criteria Formulas
TC2000 Support Articles
Users browsing this topic
Guest-1

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.