| mmalarky |
|
Gold User, Member, Platinum User, TeleChart
|
| Registered User |
|
|
|
|
| Unsure |
|
| Thursday, March 22, 2007 |
| Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:08:07 PM |
2
[0.00% of all post / 0.00 posts per day] |
|
wow! what a difference the revised version makes. I suggest anyone still struggling to download today's version of yesterday's Worden note. In addition to correcting the 'coding' errors, a couple more lines of Sam's narrative have been included which complete his thoughts -- still not a jackanory, but now very complete. (I suspect the original confusion emanated from the website's editing process, likely owing to the press to get it published timely.)
I would like to also (echoing Edisto's sentiment) take a moment to acknowledge with gratitude the effort and generousity of spirit of Sir 9-Day for sharing with us something that has been a money spinner for him.
Best regards,
Mark
|
Howdy,
Reading the Worden Report for today (Fri 7Mar08), I was fascinated by the submission by Sir 9-day Periods, who went to great length to describe his mechanical trading method. Don Worden's intro characterized his description as superb, so I figured I'd mock up watchlist based on his submission just to see what it would kick out.
Sadly, I'm afraid I don't speak the lingo well enough to understand what he was indicating was the filtering criteria. Specifically , he proposes to input the following to the boolean formula segment: CC3. Problem I have is that this isn't recognized as a valid formula, and I have no idea what it could possibly be referencing.
When I posed this question to support@worden, they kicked it back to the author; but I'm wondering if any of you guys could make sense of it without pestering a long-term customer with what may well be a question solely borne of the ignorance of a newbie?
Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
|
|