Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. Search | Active Topics |

Profile: dduhon
About
User Name: dduhon
Groups: Gold User, Member, Platinum User, TeleChart
Rank: Registered User
Real Name:
Location
Occupation:
Interests:
Gender: Unsure
Statistics
Joined: Thursday, April 27, 2006
Last Visit: Monday, January 3, 2011 6:34:21 PM
Number of Posts: 10
[0.00% of all post / 0.00 posts per day]
Avatar
Last 10 Posts
Topic: Weeklyh Moving Average
Posted: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:03:20 PM
How would I create a weekly moving average pcf.

Would this be the proper format:

AVGC20 > AVGC20.5

if I wanted the 20 week moving average to be above the previous week's 20 week moving average?

Don Duhon
Topic: You gotta love FVE
Posted: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:41:48 PM
Hello,

How does one get to the club mentioned in this post?

.Savradbottomspringers Jr. club (internal TC Net)

Thanks.

Don
Topic: Question on upper acceleration band
Posted: Thursday, June 22, 2006 5:17:38 PM
Craig,

That - sign was magic. It works!

Many thanks.

Don Duhon
Topic: Acceleration Bands
Posted: Sunday, June 18, 2006 6:09:46 PM
Craig,

I was thinking I could put in a variable.

But if I had to choose a fixed time frame,
I would choose 3 days.

Thanks.

Don
Topic: Acceleration Bands
Posted: Sunday, June 18, 2006 4:16:36 PM
Craig and diceman

Thanks for comments.

Yes, I want to scan for prices above or below the bands on
stocks that would tend to be outside for a while instead
of bouncing out and into the bands to quickly.


I thought there might be some way to scan for
stocks that would tend to work well with the acceleration
band method. The diceman comment on volatility was what I
may have been thinking.

Also, some of Headley's comments inply that this method
works better with some stocks than others. So I'm
trying to get a list of stock that I could run this scan on.

Thanks again.

Don

Topic: Question on upper acceleration band
Posted: Sunday, June 18, 2006 4:08:23 PM
Thanks for reply.

I changed the Hx to Lx to show prices below acceleration band but can't figure out why it doesn't work properly.

Can you see any error I made?

C <= 0.05*(L0*(1+4*(H0-L0)/(H0+L0))+ L1*(1+4*(H1-L1)/(H1+L1))+ L2*(1+4*(H2-L2)/(H2+L2))+ L3*(1+4*(H3-L3)/(H3+L3))+ L4*(1+4*(H4-L4)/(H4+L4))+ L5*(1+4*(H5-L5)/(H5+L5))+ L6*(1+4*(H6-L6)/(H6+L6))+ L7*(1+4*(H7-L7)/(H7+L7))+ L8*(1+4*(H8-L8)/(H8+L8))+ L9*(1+4*(H9-L9)/(H9+L9))+ L10*(1+4*(H10-L10)/(H10+L10))+ L11*(1+4*(H11-L11)/(H11+L11))+ L12*(1+4*(H12-L12)/(H12+L12))+ L13*(1+4*(H13-L13)/(H13+L13))+ L14*(1+4*(H14-L14)/(H14+L14))+ L15*(1+4*(H15-L15)/(H15+L15))+ L16*(1+4*(H16-L16)/(H16+L16))+ L17*(1+4*(H17-L17)/(H17+L17))+ L18*(1+4*(H18-L18)/(H18+L18))+ L19*(1+4*(H19-L19)/(H19+L19)))

Don
Topic: Lower Acceleration Band
Posted: Sunday, June 18, 2006 3:01:17 AM
This formula works to find a stock price above
Headley's acceleration bands.

C >= 0.05*(H0*(1+4*(H0-L0)/(H0+L0))+
H1*(1+4*(H1-L1)/(H1+L1))+ H2*(1+4*(H2-L2)/(H2+L2))+
H3*(1+4*(H3-L3)/(H3+L3))+ H4*(1+4*(H4-L4)/(H4+L4))+
H5*(1+4*(H5-L5)/(H5+L5))+ H6*(1+4*(H6-L6)/(H6+L6))+
H7*(1+4*(H7-L7)/(H7+L7))+ H8*(1+4*(H8-L8)/(H8+L8))+
H9*(1+4*(H9-L9)/(H9+L9))+ H10*(1+4*(H10-L10)/(H10+L10))+
H11*(1+4*(H11-L11)/(H11+L11))+ H12*(1+4*(H12-L12)/(H12+L12))+
H13*(1+4*(H13-L13)/(H13+L13))+ H14*(1+4*(H14-L14)/(H14+L14))+
H15*(1+4*(H15-L15)/(H15+L15))+ H16*(1+4*(H16-L16)/(H16+L16))+
H17*(1+4*(H17-L17)/(H17+L17))+ H18*(1+4*(H18-L18)/(H18+L18))+
H19*(1+4*(H19-L19)/(H19+L19)))

How would I create this formula to show the stock
price below the bottom band?

Thanks.

Don Duhon
Topic: Question on upper acceleration band
Posted: Saturday, June 17, 2006 8:46:11 PM
For the Higher Band formula on accelation bands, how
would one use the lower band, and finds closes below
the lower band?

Thanks,

Don Duhon


Finding symbols where Price is at or above the band for today using a Personal Criteria Formula is fairly easy and probably quicker than a Visual Difference Sort (at least for large Watchlists):

C >= 0.05*(H0*(1+4*(H0-L0)/(H0+L0))+ H1*(1+4*(H1-L1)/(H1+L1))+ H2*(1+4*(H2-L2)/(H2+L2))+ H3*(1+4*(H3-L3)/(H3+L3))+ H4*(1+4*(H4-L4)/(H4+L4))+ H5*(1+4*(H5-L5)/(H5+L5))+ H6*(1+4*(H6-L6)/(H6+L6))+ H7*(1+4*(H7-L7)/(H7+L7))+ H8*(1+4*(H8-L8)/(H8+L8))+ H9*(1+4*(H9-L9)/(H9+L9))+ H10*(1+4*(H10-L10)/(H10+L10))+ H11*(1+4*(H11-L11)/(H11+L11))+ H12*(1+4*(H12-L12)/(H12+L12))+ H13*(1+4*(H13-L13)/(H13+L13))+ H14*(1+4*(H14-L14)/(H14+L14))+ H15*(1+4*(H15-L15)/(H15+L15))+ H16*(1+4*(H16-L16)/(H16+L16))+ H17*(1+4*(H17-L17)/(H17+L17))+ H18*(1+4*(H18-L18)/(H18+L18))+ H19*(1+4*(H19-L19)/(H19+L19)))

The problem in writing the formula for this being the first time Price is at or above the band in the last 30, 60 or 90 days is that the you have to make sure it is below the band the previous 29, 59 or 89 days as well.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Bruce
Topic: Acceleration Bands
Posted: Saturday, June 17, 2006 6:20:56 PM
Hello All,

Does anyone know how to create a scan that would
provide a list of stocks that would work well using
the Acceleration Bands formula that i2d2 provided?

Thanks.

Don Duhon