Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. Search | Active Topics |

Profile: xpreivax1
About
User Name: xpreivax1
Groups: Gold User, Member, Platinum User, TeleChart
Rank: Registered User
Real Name:
Location
Occupation:
Interests:
Gender: Unsure
Statistics
Joined: Saturday, January 15, 2005
Last Visit: Saturday, May 10, 2014 6:37:41 AM
Number of Posts: 17
[0.01% of all post / 0.00 posts per day]
Avatar
Last 10 Posts
Topic: Daily QStick on Blocks
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:54:26 PM
Thanks Bruce!

It looks like I've got the Qstick back!
Topic: Daily QStick on Blocks
Posted: Sunday, January 13, 2008 5:12:03 AM
When compared to TCNet, I found that I get a completly different plot for the daily QStick (and higher timeframes) with Blocks. The plot is identical for timeframes lower than 1 day, as expected. Would you have an idea why?
Topic: Chart getting compressed; Multiple studies in 1 pane
Posted: Monday, January 7, 2008 4:53:47 PM
Thanks for your detailed explanation Bruce! (I was originally trying to copy the overall panel, instead of each component separately).

Topic: Chart getting compressed; Multiple studies in 1 pane
Posted: Sunday, January 6, 2008 12:50:05 PM
Hi Bruce,
I haven't been sucessfull in trying to display more of one indicators in the same panel. Frankly, I haven't really understood your explanantion. Is there a simple way of having, let us say, a MAC and a Q-Stick in the same panel?
Thanks
Topic: RSI PCF
Posted: Sunday, July 22, 2007 7:10:27 AM
I finally found an answer to my question in a previous post by Bruce (Posted : Monday, July 02, 2007 4:52:28 PM).


Here it is:

RSI Period: 2
Use Wilders Smoothing: Checked
Avg Period: 1
Average Type: Doesn't matter (because the Avg Period is 1)

100 * ((C > C1) * (C1 - C) + .5 * ((C1 > C2) * (C2 - C1) + .5 * ((C2 > C3) * (C3 - C2) + .5 * ((C3 > C4) * (C4 - C3) + .5 * ((C4 > C5) * (C5 - C4) + .5 * ((C5 > C6) * (C6 - C5) + .5 * ((C6 > C7) * (C7 - C6) + .5 * ((C7 > C8) * (C8 - C7) + .5 * ((C8 > C9) * (C9 - C8) + .5 * ((C9 > C10) * (C10 - C9) + .5 * ((C10 > C11) * (C11 - C10) + .5 * ((C11 > C12) * (C12 - C11) + .5 * ((C12 > C13) * (C13 - C12) + .5 * ((C13 > C14) * (C14 - C13))))))))))))))) / (ABS(C - C1) + .5 * (ABS(C1 - C2) + .5 * (ABS(C2 - C3) + .5 * (ABS(C3 - C4) + .5 * (ABS(C4 - C5) + .5 * (ABS(C5 - C6) + .5 * (ABS(C6 - C7) + .5 * (ABS(C7 - C8) + .5 * (ABS(C8 - C9) + .5 * (ABS(C9 - C10) + .5 * (ABS(C10 - C11) + .5 * (ABS(C11 - C12) + .5 * (ABS(C12 - C13) + .5 * (ABS(C13 - C14)))))))))))))))

Thanks Bruce!

Xavier
Topic: RSI PCF
Posted: Sunday, July 22, 2007 6:49:01 AM
I want write a PCF to scan for stocks where the RSI (Period 2, Average 1) is below 2.

However, RSI2.1<2 does not incorporate the Wilder's smoothing.

Is there a way I could include the Wilder's smoothing in the PCF?

Thanks

(Exerpt from Telechart help:
You will also see a check box to "Use Wilder's Smoothing". We've always used exponential averaging in the calculation of RSI, but Wilder used his own smoothing method which is available by placing a check in the box. Please note, however, that PCFs created using RSI will not use Wilder's method).
Topic: Ultimate Oscillator
Posted: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:03:27 PM
Thanks for the explanation and the formula, Bruce!
Topic: Ultimate Oscillator
Posted: Saturday, January 28, 2006 3:01:02 PM
I have been trying to write an Ultimate Osccillator (8,10,28) from the formula below given by Bruce in August 2005 for Ultimate Oscillator (7,14,28). I understand the three time frames. However, can you tell me to what correspond the multplier 400, 200, 100?

Thanks.


"I've created a separate post for the Aroon Indicators and Oscillator. The following can be used as a Personal Criteria Formula or plotted as a Custom Indicator (it takes several seconds to switch symbols when used as a Custom Indicator):

Ultimate Oscillator (7,14,28):
(400*(14*AVGC7-7*AVGL7-7*AVGC7.1 +ABS(L-C1) +ABS(L1-C2) +ABS(L2-C3) +ABS(L3-C4) +ABS(L4-C5) +ABS(L5-C6) +ABS(L6-C7))/(7*AVGH7-7*AVGL7 +ABS(H-C1)+ABS(L-C1) +ABS(H1-C2)+ABS(L1-C2) +ABS(H2-C3)+ABS(L2-C3) +ABS(H3-C4)+ABS(L3-C4) +ABS(H4-C5)+ABS(L4-C5) +ABS(H5-C6)+ABS(L5-C6) +ABS(H6-C7)+ABS(L6-C7)) +200*(28*AVGC14-14*AVGL14-14*AVGC14.1 +ABS(L-C1) +ABS(L1-C2) +ABS(L2-C3) +ABS(L3-C4) +ABS(L4-C5) +ABS(L5-C6) +ABS(L6-C7) +ABS(L7-C8) +ABS(L8-C9) +ABS(L9-C10) +ABS(L10-C11) +ABS(L11-C12) +ABS(L12-C13) +ABS(L13-C14))/(14*AVGH14-14*AVGL14 +ABS(H-C1)+ABS(L-C1) +ABS(H1-C2)+ABS(L1-C2) +ABS(H2-C3)+ABS(L2-C3) +ABS(H3-C4)+ABS(L3-C4) +ABS(H4-C5)+ABS(L4-C5) +ABS(H5-C6)+ABS(L5-C6) +ABS(H6-C7)+ABS(L6-C7) +ABS(H7-C8)+ABS(L7-C8) +ABS(H8-C9)+ABS(L8-C9) +ABS(H9-C10)+ABS(L9-C10) +ABS(H10-C11)+ABS(L10-C11) +ABS(H11-C12)+ABS(L11-C12) +ABS(H12-C13)+ABS(L12-C13) +ABS(H13-C14)+ABS(L13-C14)) +100*(56*AVGC28-28*AVGL28-28*AVGC28.1 +ABS(L-C1) +ABS(L1-C2) +ABS(L2-C3) +ABS(L3-C4) +ABS(L4-C5) +ABS(L5-C6) +ABS(L6-C7) +ABS(L7-C8) +ABS(L8-C9) +ABS(L9-C10) +ABS(L10-C11) +ABS(L11-C12) +ABS(L12-C13) +ABS(L13-C14) +ABS(L14-C15) +ABS(L15-C16) +ABS(L16-C17) +ABS(L17-C18) +ABS(L18-C19) +ABS(L19-C20) +ABS(L20-C21) +ABS(L21-C22) +ABS(L22-C23) +ABS(L23-C24) +ABS(L24-C25) +ABS(L25-C26) +ABS(L26-C27) +ABS(L27-C28))/(28*AVGH28-28*AVGL28 +ABS(H-C1)+ABS(L-C1) +ABS(H1-C2)+ABS(L1-C2) +ABS(H2-C3)+ABS(L2-C3) +ABS(H3-C4)+ABS(L3-C4) +ABS(H4-C5)+ABS(L4-C5) +ABS(H5-C6)+ABS(L5-C6) +ABS(H6-C7)+ABS(L6-C7) +ABS(H7-C8)+ABS(L7-C8) +ABS(H8-C9)+ABS(L8-C9) +ABS(H9-C10)+ABS(L9-C10) +ABS(H10-C11)+ABS(L10-C11) +ABS(H11-C12)+ABS(L11-C12) +ABS(H12-C13)+ABS(L12-C13) +ABS(H13-C14)+ABS(L13-C14) +ABS(H14-C15)+ABS(L14-C15) +ABS(H15-C16)+ABS(L15-C16) +ABS(H16-C17)+ABS(L16-C17) +ABS(H17-C18)+ABS(L17-C18) +ABS(H18-C19)+ABS(L18-C19) +ABS(H19-C20)+ABS(L19-C20) +ABS(H20-C21)+ABS(L20-C21) +ABS(H21-C22)+ABS(L21-C22) +ABS(H22-C23)+ABS(L22-C23) +ABS(H23-C24)+ABS(L23-C24) +ABS(H24-C25)+ABS(L24-C25) +ABS(H25-C26)+ABS(L25-C26) +ABS(H26-C27)+ABS(L26-C27) +ABS(H27-C28)+ABS(L27-C28)))/7
Topic: Ultimate Oscillator
Posted: Saturday, January 28, 2006 12:47:52 PM
I have been trying to write an Ultimate Oscillator (8,10, 28) from the formula posted by Bruce a few months ago. I understood the 3 time frames. However, I don't understand to what correspond the multiplicators "400", "200" and "100". Would anybody have an explanation? Thanks
Topic: Triple exponential MA
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:04:45 AM
Thanks Craig!