Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. Search | Active Topics |

Profile: pendletonc
About
User Name: pendletonc
Groups: Gold User, Member, TeleChart
Rank: Registered User
Real Name:
Location
Occupation:
Interests:
Gender: Unsure
Statistics
Joined: Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Last Visit: Friday, July 5, 2019 1:38:58 PM
Number of Posts: 28
[0.01% of all post / 0.01 posts per day]
Avatar
Last 10 Posts
Topic: Running scan in new watchlist
Posted: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:03:40 AM

QUOTE (Bruce_L)

EasyScans in TC2000 v12.5 should have an Edit tab. Selecting this should bring up the list of conditions and give you the option to change the List to Scan of the EasyScan. You would need to change the List to Scan to make the EasyScan be based on a different WatchList.

Building a Scan with Multiple Conditions (7:29)

If changing the List to Scan of the EasyScan does not actually change the WatchList being used as the basis of the EasyScan, then please contact technical support.

 

Always the expert!  Will give this a try.

Thank you!

Topic: Running scan in new watchlist
Posted: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:45:02 AM

Hi,

I wrote a new scan in "MY FORMULAS".  When I run that particular scan, it continues to run on an old watchlist and not the new watchlist I selected to test the scan.  I tend to scan a larger universe but test scans on much smaller ones.

What must I do to get the scan to run on the smaller universe?  The scan is running on the High Cap 3000 what seems to be by default.  The High Cap 3000 watchlist is CLOSED while the desired watchlist is open.

Thanks.

Topic: Search function
Posted: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:46:41 AM

Hello,

It just dawned on me that I don't know how to implement a search among

the components of the pre-constructed INDUSTRY SECTORS watchlist.

If I want to find the iX designation for say BIOTECHNOLOGY, how is that

done?

Thanks.

Topic: Applying sequential scans to a watchlist
Posted: Monday, April 27, 2015 10:26:34 AM

QUOTE (pendletonc)

But if you add the conditions from two of the scans to one scan, won't they produce the same result?

 

Hi again.

I was developing  a plan per D Landry in "The Layman's Guide to Trading Stocks."

I believe he ran a prelim scan once per week that scanned for price, volume

and volatility constraints and then subjected the generated watchlist to more

specific scans daily.  Otherwise, yes, i think one program would scan all.

 

Thanks.

Topic: Applying sequential scans to a watchlist
Posted: Monday, April 27, 2015 10:11:40 AM

QUOTE (busterram)

Run the 1st scan. Once you get the list of symbols, right click and copy all those symbols to a new watchlist.

Open the second scan and where you select the universe of stock to scan, pick the watch list you saved in the earlier step.

Hope that helps.

But if you add the conditions from two of the scans to one scan, won't they produce the same result?

 

Thank you.

Yes, at first glance it would seem like simply coding for all criteria in one scan program

would do just as you said.

Topic: Applying sequential scans to a watchlist
Posted: Sunday, April 26, 2015 6:34:37 PM

Hi Bruce,

I am trying to apply sequential scans to a watchlist. For example, I start w/ the

RUSSELL 3K.  Then apply a prelim scan to return those stocks showing a

specified minimum price, minimum avg 30day volume and minimum 50day

historical volatility.  That produces a much smaller watchlist as would be

expected.  I would then like to apply a second more specific scan to the

shorter returned watchlist.  However, it seems that when I apply that second

scan, it is the original RUSSELL 3K that is scanned and NOT the shorter

watchlist derived from the pre-scan. What is the correct produre for sequential

scanning?

 

Thanks.

Topic: Commodity-related indices
Posted: Monday, February 9, 2015 2:14:13 PM

Hello,

How do I go about finding commodity-related indices in the database?  I found

DJCI and DJCI.X as well as CRY0 quite by accident.  The ticker symbol

for the Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM) was assigned to something

else entirely.

 

Thank you.

Topic: Commodity-related indices
Posted: Monday, February 9, 2015 12:46:33 PM

Hello,

How would I go about searching for commodity-related indices?  I found

DJCI and DJCI.X as well as XOIL.X quite by accident.  I looked based on

ticker symbols provided by the index owner (BCOM for Bloomberg and CRY

for ThomsonReuters Core CRB) but that failed.

 

Thank you.

Topic: Question re coding for personal indicators
Posted: Saturday, November 22, 2014 4:55:53 PM

QUOTE (pendletonc)

Hi,

I wrote a progam to scan for pullbacks to the 10-day moving avg.  The code is

as follows:

(L > AVGC10 OR L <= AVGC10)

AND (L1 > AVGC10)

AND (L2 > AVGC10)

AND (L3 > AVGC10)

AND (L4 > AVGC10)

AND (L5 > AVGC10)

AND (L6 > AVGC10)

AND (L7 > AVGC10)

AND (L8 > AVGC10)

Thank you.

 
 

By Jove I think I&#39;ve got it!

L4 > AVGC10.4 etc.

Topic: Question re coding for personal indicators
Posted: Saturday, November 22, 2014 3:42:56 PM

Hi,

I wrote a progam to scan for pullbacks to the 10-day moving avg.  The code is

as follows:

(L > AVGC10 OR L <= AVGC10)

AND (L1 > AVGC10)

AND (L2 > AVGC10)

AND (L3 > AVGC10)

AND (L4 > AVGC10)

AND (L5 > AVGC10)

AND (L6 > AVGC10)

AND (L7 > AVGC10)

AND (L8 > AVGC10)

AND (L10 > MINL45 AND L11 > MINL45 AND L12 > MINL45 AND L13 > MINL45

AND L14 > MINL45 AND L15 > MINL45 AND L16 >MINL45 AND L17 > MINL45

AND L18 > MINL45 AND L19 > MINL45 AND L20 > MINL45)

I tested the above on ticker symbol ADM,which visual inspection of the stock chart

indicates that it does indeed conform.  However, it gave back a FALSE reading.

I noticed that the value for the AVGC10 term was the same for all entries.  For example.

the values used to compute the L4 term (L4 > AVGC10) appeared as 51.15 > 51.63.

The value for the 10-day MA was given on the price chart as 50.71 for L4 (and the low

was given as 51.15).  Thus, the expression would have been expected to be 51.15 > 50.71.

What is the appropriate code term to obtain the 10-day MA value for the day in question, eg, 50.71,

versus the value used for the AVGC10 term throughout the computation, eg, 51.63?

Thank you.