| tedclimo |
|
Gold User, Member, TeleChart
|
| Registered User |
|
|
|
|
| Unsure |
|
| Friday, December 17, 2004 |
| Friday, January 16, 2009 1:50:56 PM |
16
[0.01% of all post / 0.00 posts per day] |
|
Thank you Craig,
I am now enlightened (learning my %True configurations the hard way & usually the best).
Ted
|
Craig,
Here's a new clue. On the few stocks that show the expected Yellow line @ 100% the Scale on the chart window is 0-100%.
On the Stocks that Test Formula says True yet Sort Value says 0, the scale on the chart window is 100%-101%. ie what I thought was a zero reading realyy says 100%, yet it is located down where the zero should be.
Oddly, the Sort Values still sort with 99.9 % of stocks reading 0% ??? Hope this added clue helps! Is this something you need me to take to Tech Support? Or??
Thanks for your brain-power,
Ted
|
((AVGC10-AVGC10.10)/AVGC10.10*100) > (-50) Here it is copied directly from the Percent True Settings window in edit mode.
I did the same scan as you on all stocks & got only 65 @100%(True) out of 6822.
But here lies the clue(as I said before). Many, many stocks(GS,CLF,FFH,LZ,etc) show TRUE when I test formula on them, yet the Yellow %True line remains at zero. So for some unknown reason even though the Test Formula window says TRUE, the Sort Value & Graphical representation are showing 0(FALSE).
I also put the same formula onto my laptop(which has TC2005 as well) and the exact same results occured?
Is it possible that there is another setting in TC2005 you have enabled that I do not?
HELP!
|
Craig,
The '> -50' part is an attempt to identify where price is no longer in a steep decline. I don't understand why it shows 'True' in the Test Formula Window, yet the yellow line remains pegged at zero on most stocks(check out FFH as an example)?? I did find a small number of stocks where the the %True is 100 along with the True as identified by the Test Formula Window. As you pointed out, it should be pegged at 100 on 99.9% of stocks currently.
|
Also,Why would this %True PCF display True in the Test Formula window, yet never, ever display a simultaneous yellow spike to 100%?
((AVGC10-AVGC10.10)/AVGC10.10*100) > (-50)
Very puzzling!
|
Craig-ster,
If as in the example you gave above that (AVGC60-AVGC60.60)/AVGC60.60*100 is an approximatation of the Slope measure of the 120 LR of price, then would this also be true? that(AVGC10-AVGC10.10)/AVGC10.10*100 is an approximatation of the Slope measure of the 20 LR of price?
I want to be sure there is an arithmetic transferrancy before putting faith in it.
Ted
|
Never mind, it does not correlate to the Lin Reg lines 
|
Here's a thought! Add 100 to each BOP entry to get the BOP out of negative #'s. Seems logical at this late hour. Do you see any red flags to suggest a problems?
((((100+BOP60)-(100+BOP60.60))/(100+BOP60.60)*100) - ((AVGC60-AVGC60.60)/AVGC60.60*100) ) > 0
|
Hey night owl, you're redefining Customer Service.... the competition doesn't stand a chance.
The only problem with the last pcf is that it is true for both positive & negative divergences, right?
oops on TSV.... getting sleepy
|
Me again,
Craig, I used your code to create this %True PCF in order to identify when price slope is down & BOP slope is up. I'm sure it works for TSV(never less than 0, but since BOP includes negative numbers, it may need revision. The test formula often results in a negative number(slope) for BOP even the the Lin Reg line shows a huge incline. Any ideas?
(((AVGC60-AVGC60.60)/AVGC60.60*100) < 0) AND (((BOP60-BOP60.60)/BOP60.60*100) > 0)
|
|