Download software Tutorial videos
Subscription & data-feed pricing Class schedule


New account application Trading resources
Margin rates Stock & option commissions

Attention: Discussion forums are read-only for extended maintenance until further notice.
Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. Search | Active Topics |

Profile: robjahnke
About
User Name: robjahnke
Groups: Gold User, Member, Platinum User, TeleChart
Rank: Registered User
Real Name:
Location
Occupation:
Interests:
Gender: Unsure
Statistics
Joined: Thursday, October 20, 2005
Last Visit: Monday, December 22, 2008 9:55:49 PM
Number of Posts: 4
[0.00% of all post / 0.00 posts per day]
Avatar
Last 10 Posts
Topic: Trying to understand syntax of today's Worden Report
Posted: Sunday, March 9, 2008 12:27:47 PM

Sir 9 Day (Sam)

You are both a true gentleman and a scholar. Thank you for your kind patience and clarifications.

Rob

Topic: Trying to understand syntax of today's Worden Report
Posted: Saturday, March 8, 2008 3:31:53 PM
To DocRich.

I think what you said makes great sense right up to the point where you say:
 "These are the stocks that closed at least 2% below their previous 9 day period close."

I think to get to the 2% trigger, you need to use watchlist tracking. Once the stocks that meet the criteria C<C1 and C1<C2 and C2>C3 are put in a watchlist, then you need to use the watchlist tracking feature of TC2000 for the next 9 days to see which ones (if any) drop 2% or more. Those would be your buy candidates.

Rob
Topic: Trying to understand syntax of today's Worden Report
Posted: Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:12:52 AM
Don said he notes most of the submissions he gets with "Lacks Clarity". This one he noted as "Superb". This might be "Superb" but it certainly "Lacks Clarity". The author obviously knows what he is doing, but there is clearly something wrong with "CC3"  as a criteria with  no mathematical or logical operator involved. And there are several other references that are not clear as well.  Since Don thinks this is "Superb", perhaps he could pass along a step-by-step method of implementation of the criteria (formulas used) so it could be "Superb with Clarity" :-)

Rob
Topic: Backtesting
Posted: Friday, March 31, 2006 10:29:45 PM
I have been reading the Worden notes and there have been several discussions about backtesting. I have been a user for many years and have never seen and backtesting features built into TC2000. What am I missing?