This is true; it is when he spits at others who also hold true to their beliefs that you have problems. You seem to be able to discuss without provocation because you have a grasp of the English language. You do not currently have a fan base of haters that gather on other forums.

I actually agree 100% with you. In order to succeed one must be passionate; if they wish to discuss their passion on an open forum then it might help to not berate those that you wish to convince.

Any way you are correct about the parallels between 1929 and now on some levels. It was a distorted view of prosperity, bad lending and banking practices that led to both situations.

I grow to like you Awshucks, BB and Apsll could have benefited from yours and Dicemans "discourse". Diceman with his ever controlled disposition and yourself with your direct interrogation for reality. Neither side feeling the need to discredit the other. Why you have formed such a tight weld with BB escapes me, but I am sure that you have your reasons.

Try and teach him how to debate with out embarrassing himself.

Well Awshucks you just proved one thing; that you are not BB. He will need an interpreter to make out half of what you are saying, and it was him that launched attacks against Diceman and not you. So you have my apology.

You are also correct that this is not the venue for such an artisan, one should not be stifled in their discourse; maybe tact is more what I had in mind although this still might cut across your grain, it might create balance so that more members might want to join in on the discussion. I do not disagree; of course if you feel that our way of life is threatened and that too many turn away or capitulate than speak up. I guess that my issues are more with "BB" or whoever he is today. I use the word tact again and although you are not bound by its curtsies some like to take advantage of its benefit, they feel that it helps to lubricate the complicated moving parts of communication. You have made it very clear however that this tool is not to be used on your artistic canvas so lets just leave it at that.

You are right we live in a free nation were common curtsies are not enforced.

Awshucks and achuiles"bb" you guys are a riot "although I am not sure that you are truly separate entities. Maybe you should get a room and figure that one out. It is so easy to watch all these biased utube vids and pandering pundants and feel that you have the right stuff to play armchair quarterback. We all know that the government screwed us over and they had the perfect idiot in the white house that made everything so easy. So many dogs being waged that corporate America could finally get their payday.

We were all told that we learned our lessons from the 1929 market crash. Well at least we did not make those mistakes again; we just made a whole bunch of new ones.

If you read Diceman November 21 post he makes good sense there about the technicals "they work until they don't work" well it is the same thing with the economy. I am getting sick of reading your biased opinions as though you have the pulse of the world under your index finger and all those that oppose your thoughts had better go back to school. You are like the schoolyard bullies that think you are untouchable until someone like Diceman comes around to put you in your place, it is clear by your personal attacks that have gone un-answered by him. (A true person of integrity). 

You guys are just like everyone else, you have no clue where the markets are going, you have no clue how long it will take to clean up this mess that the current administration has allowed to take place on their watch.

I am sure that in predictable form you will both follow up with attacks against my words but keep in mind that this is not a schoolyard.