Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. | Search | Active Topics | |
Registered User Joined: 8/23/2012 Posts: 59
|
Hi, how can I create a scan condition to ensure:
-current Ichimoku Cloud is Bullish and ;
-future Ichimoku Cloud is Bullish
Thanks.
|
|
Worden Trainer
Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 65,138
|
A Condition Formula for Leading Span A being above Leading Span B at the most recent point where price is plotted can be written as:
(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2
A Condition Formula for Leading Span A being above Leading Span B at the far right endpoint of where it is being plotted 26 bars in the future can be written as:
(MAXH9 + MINL9 + MAXH26 + MINL26) / 4 > (MAXH52 + MINL52) / 2
A Condition Formula for Leading Span A being above Leading Span B 26-bars in the past where Lagging Span is most recently plotted can be written as:
(MAXH9.52 + MINL9.52 + MAXH26.52 + MINL26.52) / 4 > (MAXH52.52 + MINL52.52) / 2
I think you are asking to combine the first two conditions, which would result in:
(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4 > (MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2 AND (MAXH9 + MINL9 + MAXH26 + MINL26) / 4 > (MAXH52 + MINL52) / 2
-Bruce Personal Criteria Formulas TC2000 Support Articles
|
|
Registered User Joined: 8/23/2012 Posts: 59
|
That's correct, that what I meant thanks.
Can you also provide the PCFs for:
-Baseline ?
-Conversion line ?
Thanks.
|
|
Worden Trainer
Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 65,138
|
The values of the various lines at the point where price is most recently plotted are:
Conversion (Tenkan-Sen):
(MAXH9 + MINL9) / 2
Base Line (Kijun-Sen):
(MAXH26 + MINL26) / 2
Leading Span A (Senkou Span A):
(MAXH9.26 + MINL9.26 + MAXH26.26 + MINL26.26) / 4
Leading Span B (Senkou Span B):
(MAXH52.26 + MINL52.26) / 2
-Bruce Personal Criteria Formulas TC2000 Support Articles
|
|
Registered User Joined: 8/23/2012 Posts: 59
|
Thanks Bruce.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 8/23/2012 Posts: 59
|
Hi Bruce,
As per my understanging, the Lagging Line is the current Close projected 26 bars Ago. So are the following conditions correct ?
-current Lagging line is above the price 26 bars ago = C > C26 ?
-current Lagging line is below the price 26 bars ago = C < C26 ?
Thanks.
|
|
Worden Trainer
Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 65,138
|
Yes, both of the formulas you suggest would be correct.
-Bruce Personal Criteria Formulas TC2000 Support Articles
|
|
Registered User Joined: 12/30/2012 Posts: 11
|
QUOTE (Gano)
Hi Bruce,
As per my understanging, the Lagging Line is the current Close projected 26 bars Ago. So are the following conditions correct ?
-current Lagging line is above the price 26 bars ago = C > C26 ?
-current Lagging line is below the price 26 bars ago = C < C26 ?
Thanks.
How would one add to this formula to say lagging span is greater then the 200 day exponential moving average and A and B span 26 days ago?
|
|
Registered User Joined: 12/30/2012 Posts: 11
|
I keep getting a syntax error when trying C26 > XAvg200
My goal is to get the current lagging span greater than the 200 day expotential moving average 26 bars ago.
|
|
Worden Trainer
Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 65,138
|
The problem with the XAVG200 syntax is that it is not specifying the price component you are averaging. Please try the following Condition Formula:
C > XAVGC200.26 AND C > (MAXH9.52 + MINL9.52 + MAXH26.52 + MINL26.52) / 4 AND C > (MAXH52.52 + MINL52.52) / 2
-Bruce Personal Criteria Formulas TC2000 Support Articles
|
|
Guest-1 |