Now it makes sense.  Thank you so much for the thorough explanation Bruce.  I very much appreciate it!

Happy Holidays to you and thanks again for all of your help!

Thank you Bruce.  Now I see what I was missing.  The first two PCFs you provided are what I was looking for.  Although I still don't quite undersatnd the difference between the two.  

If we just look at the most recent 252 bars.

MINL2 < MINL250.2

If we look at the most recent 252 bars at the time of the bar.

L < MINL251.1 OR L1 < MINL251.2

Thank you Bruce.  Is there a way to tweak these two pcfs so that they do not pick up 11/7/17 with with my custom % true indicator?

MINL2 < MINL250.2

Thank you Bruce.  How are these two different in their meaning?

MINL1 < MINL250.2

MINL2 < MINL250.2

Using symbol UA as an example, if I use the first one I get a custom % true indicator on 11/6/17.  But if I use the second one I get an indicator on 11/7/17.  I don&#39;t understand 11/7/17 indicator since 11/6/17 had a lower intraday 52 week low?

Would you please help me with a PCF for the following:

Assuming the year is 252 trading days long:

price made a new 52 week intraday low yesterday OR  price made a new 52 week intraday low today

Thank you!

Thank you so much for your help Bruce!  I really appreciate it!

Sorry Bruce, just one more pcf please:

Stock closed up 2% today vs yesterday&#39;s close, and yesterday stock made a new 52 week intraday low?

Not sure which of these would be part of the pcf?

L1 = MINL251.1

L1 < MINL250.2

L1 < MINL251.2

Excellent.  Thank you so much for your help Bruce.  Very much appreciated!  Have a nice weekend!

I see.  What if I wanted a PCF for:

The low yesterday was the lowest low of the year, not including today.

Fantastic!  Can you please explain what this is saying?:

L1 < MINL251.2

It looks like it&#39;s saying the low yesterday was the lowest low over the last 251 days.  But I don&#39;t understand the .2 of the MINL251.2?