Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
In a thread started last sept I adviced that the real upside was in this equity and against majority opposition here we are. Lets review briefly.
The initial thread was:
I still need to review the "bonanza bottom" but as I recall it's basically looking for volume spikes and anomalies in bottoming formations over time. Some of the examples I listed below may not be candidates...some may. Let me know. All of them have interesting volume and or other indicator patterns to me.
BBI stands out the most to me so far. Though I suspect this to be a short term bottom than most bonanza bottoms. I have to wonder if any downward price action from here should be viewed as an oportunity to get in and hitch a ride to $7.00 +?
Others may be
FLO
DSCM
MAIL
ONCW
I'd love to find I think five nice healthy bottoms for an intermediate hold this coming cycle (if it comes) and focus most of my short term trading on setups that resemble TGI around Late August when it came up on my simple approach scan. Not that it MUST have the TSV/MS moneystreammove at the same time but I think it helps and at least helps eleminate supurflous possibilities. The look of the moving averages here is ideal to my aproach. The HNC concept over slightly longer term moving averages and the position of the 20ma in relation to the 50 ma are ideal to the highest probabilities in my simple aproach
My RESPONSE was:
BBI?? Where do you see the future of BBI?
Netflix his bigger competitor already have DVD download on demand and with plans from only $4.99 per month.
How is BBI going to beat that? Even if BBI gets is download on demand service going soon - how is it going to compete with those prices.
Remember Netflix has no real estate to maintain. I can certainly see BBI much lower, just like MOVI is.
good luck
Opposition came in all kind of forms as usual - You can review this thread here
http://www.worden.com/training/default.aspx?g=posts&t=25623
I went my way and I leveraged for jus about $6000 (LEAPs - 100 contracts OOJMW strike 17.5 expiring in JAN 2009) against 10,000 shrs at 18.41 and watch in dispear while seeping my tea and you guys concentraded on BBI and tinker a little more and chat it some more.
I also shorted the stock twice in this period with stops slightly over resistant and once under way with a trailing of 10%. Both time susscefully catching 75% of the swing.
I will be unloading this coming week while the last fools come aboard. I have to unload 20,000 shrs as a few more blocks were accumulated in between.
I will keep the put options until 3 month before expiration, and if the price of NFLX is still high enough I will sell the puts (naked) for what is left of its value. If not no big deal as you can see - I take it as the cost of insurance, and it is worth is price in gold.
Where is BBI today?
|
|
Gold Customer
Joined: 11/13/2004 Posts: 102
|
Big Block -
Am I interpreting your approach correctly?
First,
You bought Jan '09 puts on 10,000 shares (100 contracts) and at the same time bought (went long) 10,000 shares.
At roughly $6000 for 100 contracts, that's $0.60 / share. So NFLX stock price only has to go up $0.60 / share at the most for you to break even (ignoring commissions). All the rise after that is gravy. Sound right so far?
Second,
I've gone back and studied the NFLX chart and the September thread that you mentioned. It appears you had fundamental criteria that made this stock one that you would consider taking a position in. (I also do that.) Did you then wait for a technical indicator(s) to actually initiate the trade? If so, what was your signal(s) that got you in?
Also, what was/is your (oops) criteria - that makes you decide that the price is not going to move as expected?
thanks Big Block,
soc
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
You are correct Socrates. It is called protective puts and married puts (those are 2 different things so). I have tried in the past to pass knowledge and information on this, with no success. Most folks here think of options as something that you need a PhD to exercise.
I have accepted that a loss is as possible as the fact that cold is the absense of heat, and so I learned to accept that. I accept it up front, by insuring the position, and then I can careless what the MM or anyone else is up to. My Risk / Reward has been accepted for a long time (hence long position for the longer term)
Second - yes my tools help me with the entry, swings, and exit. The fundamentals provided solid backup for the reason.
Understand that my main activity rest with the day trading, althought at times I carry as many as 3 or 4 positions with longer term frames I like to call my whale positions (on the side). Those positions I like to think of as business investments so I treat them as.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 9/25/2007 Posts: 1,506
|
Bigblock ...
Would you mnd explaining the chart above to a dumb ol' country boy ?
I can see that when the white line crosses upward through the green one that a buy signal is issued ...
And then when the white one crosses down through the green one ... a sell signal is issued ...
And judging by your vertical pink lines ... these signals are validated ... or perhaps more valid ... when there is an overbought or oversold conditon on the stochastic ?
Is it your assertion that the white line is "predicting the future" ... 3 days in advance ?
Or is it a lateral shift ... that ... once an event occurs ... shows that you should have acted 3 days ago ?
|
|
Registered User Joined: 2/29/2008 Posts: 17
|
Thats all well and good, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
If you really want to impress the board talk about next weeks story stock, rather than digging some stock up you happened to be right on months ago.
And i'm in the camp that thinks buying options as insurance is a waste. Why buy insurance if you have sound money management, and a stop loss? Options are just another trading vehicle, only more fickle, and have higher commissions.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 4/18/2005 Posts: 4,090
|
Nicely done..
At the time BBI looked better to me for the reasons stated in the thread. I never said i'm right all the time. Lately I'm hardly ever right. I haven't got a problem admitting it. but you don't have to know what is going to happen in the future to make money. The more I read about it it the more it seems that is when danger comes into play.. thining you KNOW what will happen.
At the time BBI looked like it could carryan upswing and I could buy more of BBI than NFLX so had It moved I would have potentialy gained more ..... you dind't know NFLX would make this move and neither did I. I suspected a move and was wrong.. You suspected a move and were right.
You also have several years on me in terms of trading experience. I'll get there.
Peace.
Scott.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
jjames I also told you not long ago about GAP. Is it my fault that you didn't get on the train.
When I told you about NFLX it was right too. Most folks steered away.
What can I do about that? I can tell you, but you have to make your decisions. I am just coming back to it later in time to tell you about it.
Just to clarify. If you think insurance is a waste, I suppose you don't insure your house, or you car right?
I think I have discuss in the pass the advantages of options over stop loss. Dig the posts and find the information on that topic please. As I said before, you will not make any money until you ACCEPT.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
Ok Reality I will try to explain the best under the limitations.
First of all in regards to
"Is it your assertion that the white line is "predicting the future" ... 3 days in advance ?"
I don't recall ever asserting such a thing. What I have probably said is that the signal shows 3 candles back in time.
The 3 lines that you see are propietary indicators - you can think of them as Buyers (yellow), Sellers (green), and Signal (White).
Signal crosses up the Sellers issues a Buy signal. Sellers crosses Buyers- comfirms Long. The reverse is also true.
To clarify - An active uptrend would be define by the system as higher highs (sellers), and higher lows (buyers). An active downtrend would be the inversed.
The system pays great attention at spotting breakouts (both ways), as those are very profitable.
There is a powerful formation expresse via signal that is embedded into the system translating into powerful short squezes on breakouts and rapid collapses on breakdowns.
During an inactive uptrend - as the sellers flattens out while the buyers continues to rise the bears are preventing the stock from rising any higher by shorting as the buyers continue to push their way slowly. The unstoppable force of the bulls meet the sellers breaking through COMFIRMED by the signal crossing the sellers, which inmediatelly causes a chain reaction triggering shorts to cover in panic as the buyers continue to push the stock higher on large volume.
There is so much more to this system, but it is long and time is limited here.
You must understand that the location of the signal is not an issue, and shouldn't be an issue at all.
Would it matter if a signal appeared 30 days back on the chart that is telling you to buy now. For all we care the signal could appear on the right upper hand side of the chart under a bell.
Location is not an issue - timing is.
It is true that you may need X days into the future to predict, and you can only have that by going back in time to compute forward that is as much as I am going to say.
While price is dropping you will many times get a buy signal and viceversa - that is true. The price most times will lead the indication. I think we can call that predicting the short term future.
A good representation of the concept here can be seen on a movie by Denzel Washington called - Deja Vu. The system has been constructed and deviced for a numbers of year before the movie was in the making in case you wonder, but when I watch the movie I found some parallels to the system. Just in case anyone wonders.
That is about as much as I can say without disclosing information that is not available to the public, and without getting in trouble here.
Hope it helps.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
Scott take it easy, everyone has slippery patches.
I had no intention to bring you into this topic or do any reference to you. You happen to be the topic started for that thread, and I can't do anything about that, can I?
I am sure that you will come around if you try hard enough. But as I said to you in the past, I think that a vacation and time away from the markets would do you good.
As I understand you live in Holland, MI. I know a sweet spot down there - Grand Heaven. Rent a place down there and take the family there for a couple of weeks or perhaps a month. It is beatiful there, and soon it will be warmer. It is not far away from Holland.
Take care.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 4/18/2005 Posts: 4,090
|
I am taking a break from Trading... but it's got to be at home. NO way I can take the family anywhere for a few weeks.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,181
|
BigBlock;
some nice calls here....and great advice to Scott.
Scott, I have to concur, unwind a little. A quick anecdote, when I coach young men playing football, I watch carefully for guys getting into a stream of mistakes. They start unraveling mentally because they think that all they can do is make mistakes. We'll pull them out of the game but not because they are making mistaking or hurting the team. No, we pull them out because they need our help and encouragement to get their heads back on straight. One of the coaches will walk away from the sidelines with a young man and reassure him of how fine a young man we all believe he is. Once he's got his confidence back, we'll send him back in ready to go on the attack and play like we all know he can.
There's not a one of us who doesn't need some head clearing now and then. As I tell new skiers when I'm teaching them, don't stare at the obstacle or you'll head right for it. Target fixation can be a bad thing.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 9/25/2007 Posts: 1,506
|
Bigblock ...
Perhaps I could have chosen better verbage ... but it was just a question ... not an accusation ...
But ... to clarify ... in so far as the mechanics of the use of this system ...
One would find out on, let's say, Friday ... that a particular security issued a buy/sell signal on Tuesday ...
And therefore ... take up that position on Friday ...
Is that correct ?
|
|
Registered User Joined: 4/18/2005 Posts: 4,090
|
QUOTE (tobydad) BigBlock;
some nice calls here....and great advice to Scott.
Scott, I have to concur, unwind a little. A quick anecdote, when I coach young men playing football, I watch carefully for guys getting into a stream of mistakes. They start unraveling mentally because they think that all they can do is make mistakes. We'll pull them out of the game but not because they are making mistaking or hurting the team. No, we pull them out because they need our help and encouragement to get their heads back on straight. One of the coaches will walk away from the sidelines with a young man and reassure him of how fine a young man we all believe he is. Once he's got his confidence back, we'll send him back in ready to go on the attack and play like we all know he can.
There's not a one of us who doesn't need some head clearing now and then. As I tell new skiers when I'm teaching them, don't stare at the obstacle or you'll head right for it. Target fixation can be a bad thing.
good point ! ... Perhaps I got so focused on not taking another loss that subconsciously i'm focusing on things that are likely to be loosers.
My strategy however was intended to keep me from even shopping in the danger zones and raise my probabilities of having a winning trade even if I missed on my analysis. but then it was intended to be used in uptrending markets which we no longer have.
I'm trying to put
|
|
Registered User Joined: 4/18/2005 Posts: 4,090
|
QUOTE (tobydad) BigBlock;
some nice calls here....and great advice to Scott.
Scott, I have to concur, unwind a little. A quick anecdote, when I coach young men playing football, I watch carefully for guys getting into a stream of mistakes. They start unraveling mentally because they think that all they can do is make mistakes. We'll pull them out of the game but not because they are making mistaking or hurting the team. No, we pull them out because they need our help and encouragement to get their heads back on straight. One of the coaches will walk away from the sidelines with a young man and reassure him of how fine a young man we all believe he is. Once he's got his confidence back, we'll send him back in ready to go on the attack and play like we all know he can.
There's not a one of us who doesn't need some head clearing now and then. As I tell new skiers when I'm teaching them, don't stare at the obstacle or you'll head right for it. Target fixation can be a bad thing.
good point ! ... Perhaps I got so focused on not taking another loss that subconsciously i'm focusing on things that are likely to be loosers.
My strategy however was intended to keep me from even shopping in the danger zones and raise my probabilities of having a winning trade even if I missed on my analysis. but then it was intended to be used in uptrending markets which we no longer have.
I'm trying to put togeatehr somethign
|
|
Registered User Joined: 4/18/2005 Posts: 4,090
|
QUOTE (tobydad) BigBlock;
some nice calls here....and great advice to Scott.
Scott, I have to concur, unwind a little. A quick anecdote, when I coach young men playing football, I watch carefully for guys getting into a stream of mistakes. They start unraveling mentally because they think that all they can do is make mistakes. We'll pull them out of the game but not because they are making mistaking or hurting the team. No, we pull them out because they need our help and encouragement to get their heads back on straight. One of the coaches will walk away from the sidelines with a young man and reassure him of how fine a young man we all believe he is. Once he's got his confidence back, we'll send him back in ready to go on the attack and play like we all know he can.
There's not a one of us who doesn't need some head clearing now and then. As I tell new skiers when I'm teaching them, don't stare at the obstacle or you'll head right for it. Target fixation can be a bad thing.
good point ! ... Perhaps I got so focused on not taking another loss that subconsciously i'm focusing on things that are likely to be loosers.
My strategy however was intended to keep me from even shopping in the danger zones and raise my probabilities of having a winning trade even if I missed on my analysis. but then it was intended to be used in uptrending markets which we no longer have.
I'm trying to put togeather something else ... that isn't as indicator specific, purely price and maybee volume. Quick 2-5 day trades to help me reach my main goal of taking 3-5 points a week out of the market.... Once I reach consistancy with that then I'll open up to a 2nd longer time frame strategy.
I personaly think the goal of achieving an average of 2-5 points a week is not unrealistic... but i've found it really difficult to maintain consistantly. I'm not trying to beat any markets here... Just make money.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
NO reality that is not correct. If a signal has been issued on Tuesday then you take position on Tuesday. On Friday you can collect your profits or wait for the system to generate a signal to sell (that is sell or short).
Take care.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
I would like to make it clear that I am responding to the inaccuracy of the first post and the claims within this thread as oppossed to the author as I have chosen not to engage in meaningless one sided debates with said person. In the refered to thread or link to said thread the author has mis-represented the thrust of the topic and even during the very thread itself was so misguided in his iterpretations if its intent that he was the enevatable cause of getting the thread locked.
The true and original thrust concerning BBI back in late August and into September (I first noticed BBI in late August) was that it looked like it might be a good short term rally coming from a nice bottom. Scott and I were discussing this as someone interjected with the idea that NFLX was the better play for Fundimental reasons. Even after enlightening said person that we were only looking at a short term approach he continued his assault on our choice and proceeded to destroy an otherwise fine thread that started out with the inocent discussion about bonanza bottoms. The long term out come between BBI and NFLX was never even part of the original discussion on that thread, It was only coming from his assertions that did not concern us at the time. And by the way the short term rally was formed from the bottom of BBI and as far as all concerned back then (exept the very one that interupted and destroyed the thread) that was the end of it.
Jjames you are so right. This person is so wraped up in proving realtime results for others, but I guess that he is exempt. I love his quote to Sacron11 - "Everyone gets "lucky" once in a while that doesn't make anyone right, but will be costly to the fool".
Scott please stop ingratiating your self to this person you and I explained our stand on BBI back in the original thread so long ago and were proved to be right. His expaination of his "propietary indicators" on his charts to Realitycheck is like something out of a science fiction movie. As a matter of fact it is!! I saw and love that movie by Denzel Washington called - Deja Vu.
This person always says that he does not have the time to go into any details about the construction of his science fiction indicators, but once said to me that he has all the time in the world to stain my threads with his poison. I challange this person to use his clairvoyant charts to pick a stock show us how the indicators picked the entry and then we can all see the follow through together. Is this not what he has asked of some here?
Scott you do not need to take time off from the markets, you just need to learn how to focus on one approach and do what ever you can to make it work.
I just wanted to set the record straight and accurrate.
Apsll.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,181
|
Scott,
apsll has hit your real problem right on the head. I've said it to you on more than one occasion; you put real money into one new technique after another...and before you have mastered them. You are creating your own confusion. Find one technique that fits your temperament and goals (assuming you clearly know your goals) and master it (someone will argue about changing markets and blah blah blah but to master a system is to understand all that; when to use it, when not to, how to modify for varying conditions, etc).
When you have that one technique mastered, then begin with a second. But (and I say this only for your sake), it seems like every week you've got something new you're trying. There is no way to get them all down at once; especially when working with real money and live markets. (The best traders make a nice living off people out there experimenting.)
That is why I differ with apsll on this one and say that you do indeed need a little time away from live trading. Not a lot of time necessarily, just enough to clear your head.
And apsll, we have agreed on most everything over the years but I have to say that you seem to fan the flame with BigBlock everytime we almost have it under control. I offer BigBlock's tone in his last several posts as evidence that he is willing to be civil.
I suggest you stop worrying about what everyone here thinks of you; you know what we all think of you and it's only good. You don't need to defend yourself, let your trading speak for itself. Frankly, nothing else anyone says is going to matter around here anyway, there are far too many very experienced and knowledgeable traders that can see what's what.
Have enough respect for the rest of us to know that we can separate the forest from the trees. When someone has something to say about you or anyone, I don't go jump off a cliff because my world has fallen apart, I look at you and see what kind of person you've been; then I look at the other person and see if there could be a misunderstanding and, if so, why. Then, if I can do something definitive and substantive to help, fine, if not, I mind my own business knowing that, sometimes, people will think what they will and no amount of my words are going to change it.
I suggest you take a deep breath, accept BigBlock for who he is and go about your trading (and life). Life's too short. You guys rub each other the wrong way so just quit rubbing.
Offered only as a friendly suggestion,
tobydad
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,181
|
One last thought, we all understood that BigBlock was pointing out a great long term pick and how he came to it while you and Scott were discussing swing or very short term moves and how you were selecting them.
Two perspectives, two different types of trades, plenty for all to learn. It's all good.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
Very good advice Tobydad, to Scott and myself. It is just hard to read this person pat himself on the back defending a situation wich did not go down in the way he is deluding himself. You are right nothing that anyone has or can do will de-rail what he does or is. I will stop fanning the flames, and as proof I will not respond to his forthcoming response that we all know will be swift and colorfull.
Thanks for reminding me that we should only focus on our own trading and leave others to theirs..
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
I challange this person to use his clairvoyant charts to pick a stock show us how the indicators picked the entry and then we can all see the follow through together. Is this not what he has asked of some here?
Aspll
Sure ASPLL - Just give me a stock and I will run it for you. I will try to keep you updated on the signals as time permits.
JUst one stock - I am not going to be running here an advising service for free.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
Bigblock it is kind of hard now since the markets are bouncing along with almost every stock. I am looking at my bounce and VSA scans from last Wed & Thursday and 90% are bouncing and I am making money.
Despite my destain for you I am going to sign up for your software I have already made three times that amount just today alone $295.00 is a spit in the bucket for me. I have got to get to the bottom of this set-up of yours. Since I am taking this leap for you, and If I find the system credible, then I will oppologize to you and try to have a decent relationship. But I will also ask that you try to listen to the wise words that Tobydad layed on you in a seperate thread. To use honey instead of vinegar. ( Not to be sacron but civil ), sorry sacron11 no pun intented....
Lastley as is my nature I will share everything that I learn over there right here with my friends (for free).
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
Bigblock just to give you one to work with until I purchase and work with @@@@@@ here is a ticker that (IMO) Is a good VSA candidate - NHWK
Put your charts to work on this one. I expect a turn soon.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
Well that is a bad looking chart to go long, but ... lets say what the system has to say.
I agree that it is oversold in 3 time frames daily, 3 and 13 days, that is a positive but....
It is really too bad you choose not to short - you could be sitting on big pile of cash on this one.
Anyways, here it goes - I am just going to post the trigger chart, which is the one that gives signals.
Righ now this is a wide open short with no prospects of turning as clearly seem below.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,181
|
I have to agree with BigBlock on this, that's a scary chart for longs....especially in this market.
You just can't beat BigBlock's logic in this market, why fight so hard trying to go up when everything's going down? (Now I must say that I'm a long trader but I haven't talked much about my trades because they're so contrarian in this market...not to mention dangerous).
Anyway, apsll, what do you see in this that makes you think it's turning? I don't see any signs of real strength for the last 180 days or so.
You're always good at spotting good stocks, it's got me curious on this one.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,181
|
By the way, I just put a fibonacci fan, arc and retracement lines on that chart upside down and can't find anything to act as support anytime soon.
OK, my curiosity is officially piqued; what do you see that points to a turn around?
|
|
Registered User Joined: 2/7/2006 Posts: 218
|
That is a good system...I like it...and it delivers exceptional returns in a volitile market....Its been a while since i have posted...Im kind of off and on with the service since 2000 when i was baptised with fire learning how to trade...my name was Aksportsman for the longest time...Hows life treating you BB...sounds like you have some critics latley
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
Tobydad, as you know MP and I have been looking at the theory of VSA, and I have been successfull so far in predicting turn arounds due to signs of accumulation based on the VSA theory. These turn arounds are not immediate of course so you have to watch for them. Just the fact that the accumulation pattern is prevelant is a good enough warning sign for me to feel confident of the eventual turn. Now it can be a one, two, three day rally or longer. I also need one more factor to seal the deal. There has to be strong Institutional involvlement.
In my first chart you will simply see an example of the VSA theory. When there is a volume spike that is at least twice the norm, some will say that smart money is involved one way or the other. VSA says that smart money is always looking for new ways to hide their accumulation action. since it is impossible to hide the Volume action then they are left with the price action, and what better way to hide your buying then when the weak hands are selling in a downtrend. If you look at where price closes in a given trading session or bar then you can get a clue as to the type of acction that was taking place. If price closes close to its low for the day then one can assume that there was more selling than buying. and when price closses closer to the high for the session or bar then you can assume that there was more buying action taking place. If price closses in the middle of the bar then this can mean that both buying and selling were taking place. Now the part that most might not understand is that if price closes lower than the close of the previous session then the price bar and the volume bar will be red, and then we are programed to think bad thoughts like there can only be distribution going on not accumulation. These preconcieved thoughts are untrue and you must un-learn what you have learned about this. If price is in down trend and you see some unusualy high volume spikes (RED) and the price bar was also long and the close was cose to the high for the day,(even though price closed lower than yesterday), or even just slightly above the center, then you can believe that smart money was accumulating shares that day. Remember they do not want price to rise as they are accumulating and they also want bargan prices.
I will look for these volume (RED) spikes and then wait for the bounce. Now Bigblock you say that the bounce theory that I did design and VSA that I did not design are a waste of time but I am making money from both and on a steady pace as well, now there has to be something to that. No one is that lucky. You will see that within a week or so maybe less NHWK will bounce and I will be there to take even a small profit.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
|
|
Registered User Joined: 4/18/2005 Posts: 4,090
|
APSLL
I had the strong impression that your bounce strategy was a day trading aproach... but I looked through some of my watchlist charts last night on the template and many followed through for a several days. Is that the norm or just because of this broader market rally?
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
Scott if you read back over the threads you will see that day trading is an option along with short term holds of just a few days or longer. It all depends on the volume, how much profit I have and if the stock looks like it might turn on me. If price goes into the close with momentum then I will hold over night or a few days. Every case is different. The trick is to keep the front advancing and cover your rear. A good battle strategy that works in many facets of life.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 4/18/2005 Posts: 4,090
|
Either way your advocating checking it during the day to make the decision as to hold over night or not. Can't realy do that any more.
I noticed that my MINL10 rally idea and some of your pcf's catch the same things. Just got me to thinking maybee I was mistaken about the day trading approach.
have you put any thought into starting from weekly candles for the sorting process then managing from daily candles ?
Aside from not really being able to day trade because of the baby, the winter apears to be over and there are tons of other places I'd rather be than stuck to the trading screen. Historicaly I was more proffitable when I was not. Granted I'm able to keep more of my losses considerably smaller when I micromanage.... but I also prematurely exit allot of great runners that way... I think the net result is lower performance expectation. . . . for ME.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/25/2005 Posts: 864
|
Hey Apsll concerning NHWK,
Personally, I would rather see another Big Red Volume Spike before I could say that I think the bottom has been reached on this one. Your entry here may or may not be a bit premature currently.
Just my opinion.
mp
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/25/2005 Posts: 864
|
also, wouldn't mind seeing stochastics turning upward with the spike.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
MP, I did not say that this was the bottom or that I was entering the stock here. Remember we are looking for different things with VSA. I have already seen the accumultion days on 1/29/2008 and 2/14/2008 which I believe will soon be resolved, not with a volume spike, but stochastics and price action.
Scroll back to the 11/15/2007 spike and see that you got what you wanted, on the 16th you had your day trade for a good profit but I got what I wanted on 11/27/2007 the trend changed in the stochastics (No volume spike, only price action and stochastics turn around). See what I mean now.
I am watching the tape on this closely all day to see how the number of shares and when, are affecting price.. (research). Weak hands selling at the open down to $8.29 then at 10am all buying about 2,000 shares per minute drove price up to $8.85 That says acumulation to me.
Look Bigblock might be right, maybe years from now I will laugh at the research that I am doing now, but I cannot get to a few yearws from now without doing my work and putting in my time.
Bigblock you said that you wish that you had someone like you to tell you the truth of the markets and how they move, well lay it on me brother. I have been studying the markets for 10 years, trading them for 8 years, trading them successfully for 5-6 years and this is were I am at. you laugh at my work like maybe I will in retrospect some day, be a mentor what should I stop wasting my time on (even though I am making money consistantly) what should I be studying instead of the tape, volume and the price action???
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
Bigblock you said that you wish that you had someone like you to tell you the truth of the markets and how they move, well lay it on me brother
Aspll
That was a long long time ago my friend. I no longer need anyone to tell me anything about the markets. Certainly not you and certainly I need noone to show me your mistakes - they are clear.
What you claim is institutuional selling you don't know for sure - do you? Could it be a single client trying to unload huge blocks? Could the market maker group orders and execute them as bigger aggregates to increase his commision in time, while providing better pricing at the bid or ask? Could it be the market maker himself just trying to create a market? Remember the market maker has more leverage than the institutions themselves.
I mentioned in a different post that: Some folks over here seem to think that they can follow smart money by looking at a volume bar. Besides the fact that all you can read in a volume bar is an assumption on the reason. Those who are not assuming know the real fact, and those who know the real fact are not reading the volume they are making the volume. Think about it.
Anyways when my system issues a buy signal I will let you know.
In the main time why don't you please provide the signals of your system. Or is it just tinkering all you do?
Take care
|
|
Registered User Joined: 6/9/2007 Posts: 68
|
Looks like you two are pushing each others' buttons again.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
That is a good system...I like it...and it delivers exceptional returns in a volitile market....Its been a while since i have posted...Im kind of off and on with the service since 2000 when i was baptised with fire learning how to trade...my name was Aksportsman for the longest time...Hows life treating you BB...sounds like you have some critics latley
Akqj10 - Aksportsman nice to see you. I just run across Petry a couple of days ago. That is 3 old timers in the board. may be we can show these new boys how it is done.
Stick around my friend, it is just about to get interesting here if this guy Apsll give us something real to work with (signals).
Take care.
|
|
Registered User Joined: 3/21/2006 Posts: 4,308
|
Scott is correct, you do not even read the post before you concoct your rable. You have missed every point that I mentioned. How can someone carry an intelligent dialog with you?
First off it is Apsll not Aspll unless it is intentional then you are one dyslexic @@@@@@.
Second, I stated the term "Accumulation" and not institutional selling...
Third I have stated repeatedly that my buy signal is found in the stockastic and price action not in the volume. I am scaning for volume like one would for smoke, because where there is smoke, fire usually appears at some point (not right away).
"That was a long long time ago my friend. I no longer need anyone to tell me anything about the markets. Certainly not you"
This statement is coming out of left field and I do not even know what the catalyst was that sparked it? It is becoming clear that you are just not someone that I cannot comunicate with. I think that you like to talk but it is clear that you listen very little (a wise old owl you are not). I also was in the process of ordering your product when it accured to me that it might not be a good idea for someone like you to have my address and other personal information.
You are by-polar I think, one moment you appear lucid and approachable, and the next you are a rambling idiot. My original plan was to ignor you, until you mis-represented my intentions from a previous thread and I felt the need to respond. Can you please do me a favor and the next time you have a lucid moment can you right yourself a note to not mention anything about me or my systems or my previous threads or how you were right and I was wrong. You scare me. I am going to try my hardest to stick with my plan to ignor you...
|
|
Registered User Joined: 10/7/2004 Posts: 2,126
|
Just post the signals and cut the crap.
By the way do not see anyone's personal information. Just so you know. It is all automated and even the folks there do not see it. In any case I would have no inclination to do so.
You just couldn't swallow your pride on the real thing. But again those who do not accept will continue to pay the price of playing a game they are not equipped to play. Just like you.
|
|
Guest-1 |