New version 18 available now


Download software Tutorial videos
Subscription & data-feed pricing Class schedule


New account application Trading resources
Margin rates Stock & option commissions

Welcome Guest, please sign in to participate in a discussion. Search | Active Topics |

Profile: Chris55
About
User Name: Chris55
Groups: Gold User, Member, TeleChart
Rank: Registered User
Real Name:
Location
Occupation:
Interests:
Gender: Gender:
Statistics
Joined: Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Last Visit: Saturday, October 20, 2018 10:53:44 AM
Number of Posts: 266
[0.09% of all post / 0.31 posts per day]
Avatar
Last 10 Posts
Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2018 3:28:27 PM

Sorry, I see you've taken that into account. Thanks for all your help. Chris 

Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2018 9:24:41 AM

Thanks much Bruce,

I may have noticed something in your formula:

The Spread (BBBOT - EMA13 uses 0.2, 20 for the BB). However the Spread is the source of a 'second' BB which uses the different parameters 0.55 and 21.

It is within the bottom to the center line of this second BB that we are looking to find the EMA13, and if present, it should be lower today than 3 bars ago.

I'm seeing pretty consistent 0.2 bandwidth parameters?

Thanks,

Chris 

 

 

 

Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Thursday, October 18, 2018 3:25:48 PM

Thanks Bruce, I understand now, had overlooked the +- on the Bollinger formula.

Have another formula you might help me with:

I would like to stipulate in one PCF formula:

- Exponential Bollinger Bands (0.55, 21) are sourced from the spread BBBOT(0.2, 20) - XAVGC13

- There is an XAVGC13 below the center line and above the lower band of the exponential BB(0.55, 21)

- This XAVGC13 is lower today than it was 3 bars ago

Many thanks for your help, Bruce.

Chris 

Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 12:52:07 PM

Bruce,

I've been looking at thos two formulas and can see that the Keltner Upper and Lower channels are specified by the +/- xxx ATRs.

What I don't see offhand is a differentiation of the BBTOP and BBBOT.

In condition #1 need the BBTOP to be below the KB Top, and in #2 the BBBOT to be above the KBBottom.

Is there a way to write the PCF using BBTOP(2,20), BBBOT(2,20), KCTOP(1.3,16) and KCBOTTOM(1.3,16)?

Thanks for your insight. Kind regards,

Chris 

 

 

Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 9:39:32 AM

Thanks a lot Bruce, appreciate your help.

Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 9:16:51 AM

Thanks Bruce,

Any way I can tie these two together into one PCF? Using AND?

Kind regards,

Chris

Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 7:37:08 AM
Hi Bruce,
 
Right now I'm using two separate filters for my version of a (BB/KB) Squeeze:
 
1. The exponential BBTOP (20, 2) is below the exponential Keltner (16, 1.30) Top channel
2. The exponential BBBOT (20, 2) is above the exponential Keltner (16, 1.30) Bottom channel
 
I did these two by means of the "Create Condition" function on the chart.
 
I wondered whether you would code a PCF Condition formula for me which includes both setups
I outlined above?
 
Many thanks and kind regards,
 
Chris 
 
Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:29:08 AM

Thanks much Bruce - it was a long time ago. Thanks for simplifying these PCFs.

Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:14:56 AM
Hi Bruce,
 
Some time ago you coded a PCF condition formula for finding the three smallest consecutive bar ranges within the last 30 days (or 20 business days), as follows:
 
MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.1 - MINL3.1 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.2 - MINL3.2 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.3 - MINL3.3 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.4 - MINL3.4 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.5 - MINL3.5 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.6 - MINL3.6 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.7 - MINL3.7 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.8 - MINL3.8 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.9 - MINL3.9 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.10 - MINL3.10 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.11 - MINL3.11 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.12 - MINL3.12 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.13 - MINL3.13 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.14 - MINL3.14 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.15 - MINL3.15 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.16 - MINL3.16 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.17 - MINL3.17 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.18 - MINL3.18 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.19 - MINL3.19 AND MAXH3 - MINL3 < MAXH3.20 - MINL3.20
 
I would like to adapt this formula to look for the four smallest consecutive range bars for the same period as above.
 
Many thanks and kind regards,
 
Chris 
Topic: Ichimuko test in progress
Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2018 12:56:53 PM

Thanks very much Bruce - I appreciate your help.