Subscription & data-feed pricing Class schedule

 Last 10 Posts Topic: WStoc turning up Posted: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:53:22 PM Thank you very much, Bruce. Great help again.  Of course you are right with the odds, but just with the WStoc it seems to happen more often than with other indicators. A lookback period of 5 bars is good enough for this.   Thanx again,   Franz J. Topic: WStoc turning up Posted: Monday, March 25, 2019 5:30:57 PM Bruce, I take use of your formula IIF(TrueInRow(WSTOC12.3 > WSTOC12.3.1, 2) = 1, WSTOC12.3, 1 / 0) (for the turning up case) and I am glad I got it. But here I come with an additional question. That formula prints an up-dot not only after having an higher value before, but after having some unchanged bars before too. This is very helpful if and when the trend is changing against higher before the unchanged bars. But of course it also does print dots if and when there is no trend change (lower values before the unchanged bars).  Is there a way to adopt that PCF for printing up dots after unchanged bars only in that cases when the trend did change? thank you, Franz J. Topic: DSS Posted: Monday, March 04, 2019 4:47:43 PM Bruce, I thought it would be easy but it seems I need you help again.  D1=DSS21,3 D2=DSS42,3 D1<18 or D2<18 I tried this ( 100 *  XAVG( (XAVG(STOC21,3) -  MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)  - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3) <18)   or   ) ( 100 *  XAVG( (XAVG(STOC42,3) -  MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42)  - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3) <18)   But I get a formula error. Can you help please?   thankx,   Franz J. Topic: BOP and price integration Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:30:35 PM I would like to get to know it too,, may I have a copy as well? thx Franz J. Topic: WStoc turning up Posted: Saturday, February 23, 2019 4:00:21 PM Thank you Bruce, great. Franz J. PS: Don´t know this is of any interest: Since long time for my DSS turning up I use your formula  100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3) / ABS(XUP(XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3) ,2))) which is working well and I don´t see any need to change it. This said could it be using the TrueInRow function to smooth its calculating? Topic: WStoc turning up Posted: Saturday, February 16, 2019 10:13:18 AM Bruce, I would like to display a dot if and when that WStoc is turning up, with the dot at the actual value of that WStoc Line. I tried this  ((WStoc12.3.0>WStoc12.3.1) AND(WStoc12.3.1 82 OR 100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42)), 3) > 82)) ` And the following for the XUP case? `L * 0,9998 * ABS(((XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2)))) AND (100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)), 3) < 18 OR 100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42)), 3) < 18))`   Bruce, yes the positions of the true points seems correct, but they appear outside of the chart (if not displayed as a histogram). It seems the formulas result in values 10000x the stock price. But simple dividing the formula(s) by that number didn´t help. (I had to replace the comma in 1,0002 resp. 0,0098 by a dot).   Thanks,   Franz J. Bruce, taking away my multiplier the dots match exactly with the H. Is there still a way to have the dots slightly above the H without a syntax error? Topic: HMA 5 on BOP Posted: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 10:25:10 AM QUOTE (Bruce_L) Maybe the following for the XDOWN case? `H * 1,0002 * ABS(((XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2)))) AND (100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)), 3) > 82 OR 100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42)), 3) > 82)) ` And the following for the XUP case? `L * 0,9998 * ABS(((XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XUP(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2)))) AND (100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)), 3) < 18 OR 100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42)), 3) < 18))`   Bruce, yes the positions of the true points seems correct, but they appear outside of the chart (if not displayed as a histogram). It seems the formulas result in values 10000x the stock price. But simple dividing the formula(s) by that number didn´t help. (I had to replace the comma in 1,0002 resp. 0,0098 by a dot).   Thanks,   Franz J. Topic: HMA 5 on BOP Posted: Sunday, April 08, 2018 5:28:31 PM QUOTE (Bruce_L) Please try the following Condition Formula. `((XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42.1.1, 3), 42)), 3), 2))) OR (XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21.1.1, 3), 21)), 3), 2)) AND XDOWN(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), AVG(100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42, 3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)), 3), 2)))) AND (100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC21,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21) - MIN(XAVG(STOC21,3), 21)), 3) > 82 OR 100 * XAVG((XAVG(STOC42,3) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42, 3), 42)) / (MAX(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42) - MIN(XAVG(STOC42,3), 42)), 3) > 82)`   Bruce, with your formula working fine, I tried to have a "condition true" dot displayed above the candles (resp. below them for the XUP case). But I couldn´t find out where to place my multipliers *H*1,0002 resp. *L*0,9998. Please how to implement that parts? Thank you, Franz J. Topic: Moving Averages in gear x % of the time Posted: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:08:24 PM Thanks, but it seems to me this is an indicator summing up the days with sma50>sma100 true, with that condition met every day (I may be wrong). What I am looking for is a scan, which can show which symbols met that condition in x % of the last z bars. Setting set formula = 1 as a condition, I don´t get the desired results.